CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Fidelity CFD

regrading ven leer fvs

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 11, 2004, 07:21
Default regrading ven leer fvs
  #1
amit kumar khatri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i need to know how to implement solid wall and far-field boundary conditions for van leer flux vector splitting scheme, if anyone is aware or can guide me to some reference.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2004, 14:17
Default Re: regrading ven leer fvs
  #2
khalid sultan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi: assuming you mean (VAN) LEER; one way of implementing the boundary conditions is by introducing (GHOST CELLS): that is; you generate in your code a group of cells that are taged as ghost cells. Having this done; you should put a (SUITABLE) values of the primitive variables ( rho, u, ...) such that the boundary conditions are satisfied ( in your case [solid wall = no slip] condition ).

The same applies for the far field BCs. The simpliest far field BCs are identified through the method of characteristics (either you copy them from the flow field or simply impose the infinity values ; this depends on the characteristics). If you wish to implement more complicated far field boundary conditions find some thing about the so called "sponge layer".

good luck!

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jacobian Matrix of Van Leer Flux Splitting Vector Jackson Main CFD Forum 2 July 29, 2010 11:57
van leer and cds scheme for LES smc fabian Main CFD Forum 2 March 31, 2006 03:22
Van Leer scheme mer Main CFD Forum 0 February 21, 2004 06:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00.