|
[Sponsors] |
April 9, 2004, 04:11 |
Rotor 37
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i give the value of k and e like this :114.84375,1619396.7 ,which is caculated in line with the formulation of the NUMECA menu.i am not sure where the problem lies in ,mesh or the boundary conditions.when it runs to the fine mesh ,it just appears the information that reads pressure negative and density negative .
|
|
April 9, 2004, 23:26 |
Re: Rotor 37
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think it is the problem of mesh,maybe you should check the quality of the mash such as orthogonality,Aspect ratio, expansion ratio and so on,I have met such problem,good lucky.
|
|
April 12, 2004, 10:58 |
Re: Rotor 37
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thank you a lot !i then try it .i appreciate your kindness.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did anybody run he ROTOR 67 by using CFX? | MouseInMilk | CFX | 0 | August 30, 2006 19:37 |
Rotor 37 | Max MIheev | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 12, 2005 15:05 |
rotor 37 | sunshine | Fidelity CFD | 2 | October 1, 2004 05:29 |
about rotor 37 | sunshine | Fidelity CFD | 1 | June 2, 2004 09:38 |
rotor 37 | sunshine | Fidelity CFD | 0 | April 6, 2004 22:21 |