CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Fidelity CFD

Full Matching mesh

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 10, 2018, 06:53
Default Full Matching mesh
  #1
New Member
 
Allen George
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 13
allenjohngeorge is on a distinguished road
I am trying to mesh an axial turbine cascade with tip gap in AUTOGRID5. In the tip gap region the mesh is not matching fully (image attached). I would like to know whether its possible to make the mesh in this region matching without any node discontinuity. I was not able to find an option in AUTOGRID5 in expert mode to make this mesh matching. If somebody knows the solution for this, please help. Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mesh_non-confromal.jpg (200.3 KB, 26 views)
allenjohngeorge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2018, 07:24
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 19
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
Hi;
different topologies exist in AG5 to mesh the blade rows among which "Default" and "HOH" are suitable for axial machines.
In case of "Default" topology, boundary patches in tip gap usually remains fully matched(I actually tested it many times!). However if the mesh is of "HOH" type tip gap blocks will not necessarily be matching. Although a NMB will not impose important errors in simulations you can try "Default" topology to see its impact on NMBs.

Regards
Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 21, 2018, 04:46
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Allen George
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 13
allenjohngeorge is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much for your input.



I have selected the Matching Peridoicty option for getting matching meshes at the side periodic boundaries. Now I have deselected it and when I give equal number of points in suction and pressure side, I am able to get matching mesh inside the tip gap region.


Regards,


Allen
allenjohngeorge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2018, 04:06
Default
  #4
New Member
 
abdul
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 9
eng.abdul is on a distinguished road
In my opinion, having matching boundaries on the side of suction and pressure surface is more important than having to match in the tip gap region. and I agree to this that non-matching mesh in the tip gap does not make a difference.
eng.abdul is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Full not matching boundary Luza Belmont Fidelity CFD 5 July 12, 2015 20:16
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh no layers and no decent mesh for complex geometry pizzaspinate OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 25, 2015 08:05
[ICEM] Generating Mesh for STL Car in Windtunnel Simulation tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 48 April 15, 2013 05:24
[Gmsh] 2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH aeroslacker OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 12 January 19, 2012 04:52
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00.