CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Fidelity CFD

AutoGrid5: Change direction of a segment

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 18, 2015, 06:18
Default AutoGrid5: Change direction of a segment
  #1
New Member
 
David Sauter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
David Sauter is on a distinguished road
Hi

I am using AutoGrid5 9.1-2 to create a mesh of the cavities of an axial turbine. I need all the blocks inside each cavity to have a matching connection. In the spanwise and streamwise direction I can enforce this manually setting an equal number of points at adjacent segments.
However, at some interfaces, the blocks are not matching in the azimuthal direction because of a different clustering of the adjacent faces. I made the observation that this is the case between the two blocks where the cavity inlet is matching the channel. (See attached picture. The problem occurs at the interface indicated by the yellow line).

I figured that the problem is because the direction of the segments at the channel matching connection (green arrows) are pointing in the same direction. In the cases where they are pointing away from each other, the problem doesn't occur.
So my question is: Is there a way to change the segment orientation in order to get the green arrows to point away from each other at every channel connection interface? Or is there another way to enforce a matching azimuthal clustering on all blocks in the cavity?

I am fairly new to AutoGrid. (In fact, I am new to mesh generation mesh generation in general.) So any help would be greatly appreciated.
Attached Images
File Type: png segment_direction.png (27.5 KB, 33 views)
David Sauter is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 18, 2015, 06:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 19
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
Dear David;
I think the current block distribution needs to be modified. there are some improperly defined blocks with highly distorted elements that substantially lowers the quality of meshes.
It is recommended to use only one block at channel connection edges. this will solve the problem.
one more point is that: "use the lowest possible number of blocks"

Regards
Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 18, 2015, 07:44
Default
  #3
New Member
 
David Sauter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
David Sauter is on a distinguished road
Dear Hamidzoka

Thank you very much for your quick answer. The way you recommended to proceed makes sense to me.

However, modifying the blocks manually led me to another issue. (Which I hope is not too basic for this thread). The blocks I added manually are not automatically mapped at the outer segments any more (i.e. at the cavity wall and at the channel connection). How can I manually map at least the channel connection in order to achieve a matching connection?
I already created Z-constant lines, but this did not resolve the issue.
I have imported the cavity geometry from an .igs file and applied the automatic domain definition.

Best regards
David Sauter is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 19, 2015, 00:24
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 19
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
Dear David;
Normally adding z-constant lines provides a matching connection between the two. But it is not mandatory and non-matching connection (i.e. using no z-constant line) is still reasonable. one important issue here is that blocks are completely mapped to the geometry of the cavity.
Maybe I can help if I have the AG files.

regards
Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 14, 2015, 04:31
Default
  #5
New Member
 
David Sauter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
David Sauter is on a distinguished road
Dear Hamidzoka

Sorry for the late reply.

Mapping the blocks to the geometry by inserting vertices did solve that issue. However, with manual blocking, AutoGrid did not create a correct 3D mesh any more. Therefore we had to go back to automatic blocking. We then solved the problem of the non-matching patches in the cavity 3D mesh in an other manner: We opened the mesh in IGG and manually corrected the clustering at the segments that were non-matching. I consider the issue resolved now.

Thank you again for your help.

Best regards,
David
David Sauter is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No density change - rhoSimplecFoam krapic OpenFOAM 1 November 29, 2014 19:39
Radiation interface hinca CFX 15 January 26, 2014 18:11
Changing inflow velocity direction deteriorates lift and drag ziggo FLUENT 3 July 24, 2013 09:39
How to change turbulence model in InterFoam Gildeh OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 March 28, 2012 13:04
no enthalpy change across the momentum source Atit Koonsrisuk CFX 2 December 19, 2005 03:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:52.