|
[Sponsors] |
Engrid, why surface mesh is always rendered as tet mesh even though it is hex? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 12, 2012, 18:00 |
Engrid, why surface mesh is always rendered as tet mesh even though it is hex?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 689
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 21 |
1. For a simple channel flow, totally structured and hex, imported into engrid, and I am wondering why the surface mesh is always rendered as tet mesh even though it is hex? How can I change this?
2. How can I turn off the mesh, and only choose to view the surface? Thanks
__________________
~ Daniel WEI ------------- Boeing Research & Technology - China Beijing, China |
|
December 14, 2012, 09:25 |
|
#2 |
Member
Karl
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 15 |
I have only seen one mention of importing a hex mesh to engrid:
http://engits.eu/vanilla/index.php?p...5/#Comment_255 I am currently experimenting with the "create hex core mesh" function, but so far it just deletes my entire existing mesh. I think I may need to be more specific with the starting point - not sure what it is looking for. |
|
December 14, 2012, 13:56 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 689
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 21 |
Im going to write my own mesh generator from scratch
__________________
~ Daniel WEI ------------- Boeing Research & Technology - China Beijing, China |
|
December 14, 2012, 17:34 |
|
#4 |
Member
Karl
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 15 |
Ok but if you can do that why not just make a plugin for engrid that will do what you want? Seems like this would be easier than starting from scratch?
|
|
December 14, 2012, 17:45 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 689
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 21 |
haha, I know, but it seems to me that Engrid has involved too many functions.
I am planning to write a light weighted and more focused on external aerodynamic flows mesh generator. Just like, since we have the nopad++, why use notepad still?
__________________
~ Daniel WEI ------------- Boeing Research & Technology - China Beijing, China |
|
December 15, 2012, 13:00 |
|
#6 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings to all!
@Daniel:
Bruno
__________________
|
|
December 15, 2012, 15:14 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 689
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 21 |
Hi again, Bruno
For a single channel mesh, it looks different between importing it in engrid and converted it to vtk and view it then in engrid. And the latter is correct. Honestly, I have collected more than 30 opensources mesh apps. As I remember one guy once said, mesh generation is easy in a certain sense, however people all want to make it universal and that is the problem. Have a great weekend!
__________________
~ Daniel WEI ------------- Boeing Research & Technology - China Beijing, China |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error Importing Surface Mesh from GMSH to EnGrid | eric.m.tridas | enGrid | 5 | October 4, 2021 04:17 |
[blockMesh] --> FOAM FATAL ERROR: Trying to specify a boundary face | A.A. | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 41 | June 26, 2020 08:06 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
CheckMeshbs errors | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | March 11, 2009 03:34 |