|
[Sponsors] |
March 19, 2020, 06:09 |
Waveguide Junction TM/TE combination
|
#1 |
New Member
Nederland
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I have been verifying measurements from a commercial EM tool with equations implemented on MATLAB with the Mode Matching Technique for S parameters in the case of waveguide junction problems. I found in the literature that if the smaller waveguide has a TM mode (smaller waveguide surface is a sub-set of the larger waveguide in this case) and the larger has a TE mode, then the coupling is 0 no matter which kind of waveguide it is. It is shown in the paper here .
it says no matter what the waveguide structure is if the smaller waveguide has a TM mode and the larger has a TE mode, then the coupling (Inner cross product , where z is the direction of propagation) should be 0. First I derived the equations analytically for a circular waveguide where I saw it is true indeed and the reverse is also true (small waveguide with TE and large with TM). It is interesting to notice that when (S - TM and L -TE, I am referring S for small and L for large), the integrals of radial variables (ρ) and the angular variables integral (ϕ) are both 0 and when (S - TE and L -TM) only the angular variables integral is 0. Anyway, as one of them at least is 0 always, the inner cross product is 0 always for both configurations. As this is lossless, I also assume that the reverse also has to be true. However, in rectangular waveguide structures in all literature I reviewed, it is said that only (S - TM and L -TE) has 0 coupling and not necessarily the opposite is true. I don't understand why such a thing happen. What is the physical significance of this? Last edited by tworitdash; March 19, 2020 at 06:14. Reason: Latex changes |
|
Tags |
electromagnetic, waveguide |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Laplacian is used instead of a combination of divergence and gradient operators? | HakikiCanakkaleli | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 3 | September 26, 2019 08:40 |
Meshing junction between wing and nacelle using algebraic extrusion method | zacwhee | Pointwise & Gridgen | 0 | March 23, 2018 01:39 |
What is this FOAM warning: Unknown matrix type combination means? | chengdi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | May 13, 2017 22:34 |
[ICEM] Blocking strategy for sharp angle junction (Pipe) | Daniel_Khazaei | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | February 19, 2015 12:31 |
Junction Box | Anil | CFX | 2 | June 27, 2006 11:18 |