CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

Error in von-Karman vortex FSI simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 19, 2022, 05:32
Default Error in von-Karman vortex FSI simulation
  #1
New Member
 
sant
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Abubakar786 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I am trying to run a von-Karman vortex FSI simulation using CONVERGE CFD but when I am running it gives me an error as shown below. I tried all the possible ways but was not able to resolve the request you to help me with this.

***********Making an embedding change********************



MAX CFL= 9.9687e-01, MAX VISCOSITY CFL= 4.5718e-01, MAX CONDUCTION CFL= 3.3836e-01, MAX MASS DIFFUSION CFL= 5.8613e-01, MAX MACH CFL = 4.3183e+01
[ 2.80%] ncyc 267; Time 1.327753412e-01 (sec); dt= 5.151927594e-04 (dt_cfl)

ncyc= 268, time= 1.332905339e-01, dt= 5.151927594e-04, time-step limit = dt_cfl(Rank 1) WARNING: ERROR IN CELL PAIRING. CELL WITH NO ALIGNED NEIGHBOR
(Rank 1) WARNING: ERROR IN CELL PAIRING. CELL WITH NO ALIGNED NEIGHBOR
(Rank 1) WARNING: [3321] RANK1 During cell pairing, no viable neighbor found. 682 775 765 0. The volume specified by min_vol_ratio may not be met. This may adversely affect time-step control and simulation stability.
(Rank 1) WARNING: [3321] RANK1 During cell pairing, no viable neighbor found. 682 775 770 1. The volume specified by min_vol_ratio may not be met. This may adversely affect time-step control and simulation stability.
(Rank 1) FATAL_ERROR: [ 366] Something is wrong in function get_temp_from_table_massfrac: upper_energy_value must be greater than lower_energy_value!
upper_energy_value is -nan(ind), and lower_energy_value is -nan(ind).



Thanks in advance.
Abubakar786 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2022, 15:49
Default
  #2
Member
 
jetcheve's Avatar
 
John Etcheverry
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 7
jetcheve is on a distinguished road
Good afternoon! There are quite a few things that could drive this error. That being said, I do see your mesh is changing and that cell pairing is struggling. I would try to get a post.h5 file (if you are using 3.0 or later) at the time the solver crashes and take a look at the quality of the mesh. In particular look for small gaps where large cells are trying to be fit into and correct this. Check the embedding change - is it coarsening something that may be problematic? Once you've done that try again.

Good luck and let us know if we can help!

- John

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abubakar786 View Post
Hi all,

I am trying to run a von-Karman vortex FSI simulation using CONVERGE CFD but when I am running it gives me an error as shown below. I tried all the possible ways but was not able to resolve the request you to help me with this.

***********Making an embedding change********************



MAX CFL= 9.9687e-01, MAX VISCOSITY CFL= 4.5718e-01, MAX CONDUCTION CFL= 3.3836e-01, MAX MASS DIFFUSION CFL= 5.8613e-01, MAX MACH CFL = 4.3183e+01
[ 2.80%] ncyc 267; Time 1.327753412e-01 (sec); dt= 5.151927594e-04 (dt_cfl)

ncyc= 268, time= 1.332905339e-01, dt= 5.151927594e-04, time-step limit = dt_cfl(Rank 1) WARNING: ERROR IN CELL PAIRING. CELL WITH NO ALIGNED NEIGHBOR
(Rank 1) WARNING: ERROR IN CELL PAIRING. CELL WITH NO ALIGNED NEIGHBOR
(Rank 1) WARNING: [3321] RANK1 During cell pairing, no viable neighbor found. 682 775 765 0. The volume specified by min_vol_ratio may not be met. This may adversely affect time-step control and simulation stability.
(Rank 1) WARNING: [3321] RANK1 During cell pairing, no viable neighbor found. 682 775 770 1. The volume specified by min_vol_ratio may not be met. This may adversely affect time-step control and simulation stability.
(Rank 1) FATAL_ERROR: [ 366] Something is wrong in function get_temp_from_table_massfrac: upper_energy_value must be greater than lower_energy_value!
upper_energy_value is -nan(ind), and lower_energy_value is -nan(ind).



Thanks in advance.
__________________
John Etcheverry
Research Engineer
CONVERGECFD
jetcheve is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2022, 05:33
Default
  #3
New Member
 
sant
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Abubakar786 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetcheve View Post
Good afternoon! There are quite a few things that could drive this error. That being said, I do see your mesh is changing and that cell pairing is struggling. I would try to get a post.h5 file (if you are using 3.0 or later) at the time the solver crashes and take a look at the quality of the mesh. In particular look for small gaps where large cells are trying to be fit into and correct this. Check the embedding change - is it coarsening something that may be problematic? Once you've done that try again.

Good luck and let us know if we can help!

- John
Hi John,

Firstly, thanks for replying to my question.

Yes, you were correct mesh quality was the problem the large cells were trying to be fit into the small area to get rid of this I refined the mesh from 0.2 m to 0.05 m, and for simplicity, I removed the fixed embedding but I am facing the same error the simulation is crashing at the time like the previous case.

For your reference, I pasted the mesh image where I can see the mesh quality is poor,


Thanks in advance.
Abubakar786 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2022, 10:38
Default
  #4
Member
 
jetcheve's Avatar
 
John Etcheverry
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 7
jetcheve is on a distinguished road
Hello, again!

First off - can you provide more details about your simulation? Geometry, cell count, boundary conditions, when this error occurs and if something is happening at that time, etc.?

Next, if you don't see any further mesh issues I would look at your time-step and CFL numbers. Make sure these aren't set too high. Without more to go on, it's hard to troubleshoot the error you are seeing, unfortunately.

Thanks and let me know your thoughts.

- John

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abubakar786 View Post
Hi John,

Firstly, thanks for replying to my question.

Yes, you were correct mesh quality was the problem the large cells were trying to be fit into the small area to get rid of this I refined the mesh from 0.2 m to 0.05 m, and for simplicity, I removed the fixed embedding but I am facing the same error the simulation is crashing at the time like the previous case.

For your reference, I pasted the mesh image where I can see the mesh quality is poor,


Thanks in advance.
__________________
John Etcheverry
Research Engineer
CONVERGECFD
jetcheve is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2022, 16:04
Default
  #5
Member
 
jetcheve's Avatar
 
John Etcheverry
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 7
jetcheve is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abubakar786 View Post
Hi John,

Firstly, thanks for replying to my question.

Yes, you were correct mesh quality was the problem the large cells were trying to be fit into the small area to get rid of this I refined the mesh from 0.2 m to 0.05 m, and for simplicity, I removed the fixed embedding but I am facing the same error the simulation is crashing at the time like the previous case.

For your reference, I pasted the mesh image where I can see the mesh quality is poor,


Thanks in advance.
Also, just so you know, your image didn't come across properly so I couldn't get a look at your mesh.

- John
__________________
John Etcheverry
Research Engineer
CONVERGECFD
jetcheve is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
converge cfd


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2D simulation of vortex shedder with rhoPimpleFoam linkamp OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 October 31, 2016 11:00
Von karman Vortex street yoshi Main CFD Forum 6 September 10, 2005 23:09
Von Karman Vortex Rodrigo Madariaga FLUENT 1 December 19, 2002 16:07
Von Karman Vortex Rodrigo Madariaga Main CFD Forum 0 December 13, 2002 18:12
Kármán vortex street in cavitating flow behind bodies in the cavitation tunnel L. Könözsy Main CFD Forum 0 April 17, 2000 14:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:45.