|
[Sponsors] |
Error: "- temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction" |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 10, 2018, 11:28 |
Error: "- temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction"
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7 |
Fellows,
I used an example case in CONVERGE, which runs fine, but changed THE MECHANISM because of analyzing different fuel. I get this error "error - temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction" I added more AMR for the temperature, but it didn't work. Any advice? |
|
December 10, 2018, 12:19 |
|
#2 |
Member
Tristan Burton
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,
Which of our example case setups did you use to start from? What mechanism did you use to replace the original mechanism? Best regards, Tristan |
|
December 10, 2018, 12:45 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7 |
||
December 10, 2018, 16:09 |
|
#4 | |
Member
John Etcheverry
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
I have a few questions to help me out. 1 - What is the fuel you are using? 2 - What mechanism are you using to do this simulation? 3 - Did you change the liquid.dat file to account for your new fuel? 4 - Did you make any other changes, even if they seem insignificant? If you can answer any of those, it will help me to see if we can get you an answer. Regards, - John |
||
December 10, 2018, 20:12 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7 |
Hello John,
1-I replaced the nHeptane in the example case by isoCetane 2-I am trying to use a reduced mechanism for isoCetane from the literature 3-I changed the fuel in liquid.dat to account for the corresponding gas properties 4-I only refined the base grid from 0.004 to 0.0008, but that worked fine for nHeptane mechanism example case |
|
December 11, 2018, 10:31 |
|
#6 | |
Member
John Etcheverry
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
The first three items make sense to me. However - when you increase your resolution by such a substantial amount (and increase your liquid density, in this case) you could create issues with the stability of the solver due to a high ratio of mass in parcels to gas mass in a cell. When you increase your resolution your parcel count should increase as well. Take a look at the spray lecture on our website. You can reach that from the link in my signature below. Once there you can login, and go to the downloads page and find the intro spray lecture in: Root > CONVERGE_2.4 > Training_Materials > Internal_Combustion_Engine_Modeling_in_CONVERGE > Lecture_Slides. In that lecture you should find information on how we recommend increasing parcel count with increased resolution. Let me know if this helps! Thanks, - John |
||
December 11, 2018, 16:27 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7 |
Thanks for clarifying this! I am giving it another try, and will inform if there would be a problem.
|
|
December 13, 2018, 11:49 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7 |
John,
The problem is now solved and simulation is completed. Thank you! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[openSmoke] libOpenSMOKE | Tobi | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 562 | January 25, 2023 10:21 |
UDF for Back-flow Temperature | G340 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 3 | August 21, 2013 05:56 |
Inlet won't apply UDF and has temperature at 0K! | tccruise | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 2 | September 14, 2012 07:08 |
Too low temperature at combustor outlet | romekr | FLUENT | 2 | February 6, 2012 11:02 |
monitoring point of total temperature | rogbrito | FLUENT | 0 | June 21, 2009 18:31 |