CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

Gas Turbine Combustion using SAGE

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 5, 2018, 18:10
Red face Gas Turbine Combustion using SAGE
  #1
New Member
 
Touqeer Anwar Kashif
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Touqeer is on a distinguished road
Hi Everyone,

I have been trying to setup a steady state non premixed gaseous fuel(natural gas) gas turbine combustor simulation in CONVERGE CFD(v2.3), using SAGE detailed chemistry model.
Each and everytime I run this case, the temperature in the Combustor goes beyond 3500K and stays close to that value indicating that fuel is burning at that temperature, while the Adiabatic flame temperature for natural gas is less than 2500k.

I have tried multiple combinations, chaning the location of source, mapping general flow cases, but nothing seems to work

Is there any specific property in SAGE that I should change ?
Touqeer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2018, 13:53
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Gaurav_Kumar's Avatar
 
Gaurav Kumar
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Convergent Science, New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
Gaurav_Kumar is on a distinguished road
Dear Touqeer,

We suspect that the effects of the heat addition provided by the source still remains in the domain which is why you are seeing a temperature above the ADFT. If you run the case longer, you should see the effects of the source heat addition wash out of the model and the flame temperature drops to something close to the ADFT.

Since some of the accuracy of detailed chemistry is lost (specifically NOx) at large time-steps that are used in steady-state, we recommend the FGM model any time steady-state combustion is used for gas turbines. Another point is that RANS models with SAGE detailed chemistry do not account properly for the effects of fluctuations on turbulence and chemistry regardless of how resolved the mesh is. Time-accurate LES models with the SAGE detailed chemistry solver do account for the fluctuations with proper mesh size. Please see our white paper on this topic at https://convergecfd.com/resources/re...nt-science.pdf. The FGM model incorporates those fluctuations in RANS models.

We are happy to review your setup/results if you send them to support@convergecfd.com
__________________
Gaurav Kumar
Principal Engineer
CONVERGE CFD
Gaurav_Kumar is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
combustion, gas turbine, sage


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 06:21
Combustion simulation and SAGE settings Owain_Parry CONVERGE 6 January 21, 2017 10:56
CFD analysis on wind turbine rotor Ken (Wind Turbine CFD Super Rookie) Main CFD Forum 45 February 9, 2016 15:07
gas turbine combustion chamber cold flow simulation chawane FLUENT 1 January 21, 2016 11:56
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 13:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:21.