|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
J.R.
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hello. I am trying to simulate a compressible turbulent multiphase flow through a staplex cascade impactor using Fluent.The solver is density based with inlet mass flow rate and outlet pressure farfield. The solution is diverging. Is it possible that it is due to the complex 3d geormetry or is it possible to fix it in the setup?
Thank you |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Shengbai Xie
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Dear Jennifer,
I know it is a quite interesting case, but since it is for Fluent, I guess you won't find any useful guide here. BTW, why not try Converge for it? Just kidding. Good luck. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
cascade impactor, converge, diverge, fluent, multiphase |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 0 | February 13, 2002 12:23 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 21:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 13, 2000 04:48 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |