CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 25, 2016, 22:21
Default temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction
  #1
New Member
 
amrrhm
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 10
amrrhm is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

Attached is top view of a heat exchanger I am trying to simulate. The piston moves downward and pushes the fluid to outlet through the fins. I would like to model only 10 deg (out of 360 degree of the whole geometry) for computational proficiency. I have used zero normal gradient for both pressure and velocity at both sides, but I get the following error:

temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction.

Also I get:
get_temp_from_sensible_sie problem found in rank 83 at cell 34069, located at <0.0215101, 0.020375, 0.122875 >, in region 0, whose level=10, ii=910, jj=473, kk=737

and the time steps decreases dramatically and it says: time-step limited by temperature extrapolation error, recovering

I am not sure if this error is related to the boundary condition or not. It would be appreciated if you would help me about this error and also let me know if the zero normal gradient is the proper BC for my purpose.

Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: png image1.png (67.8 KB, 53 views)
amrrhm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2016, 11:01
Default
  #2
Member
 
xieshengbai's Avatar
 
Shengbai Xie
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 10
xieshengbai is on a distinguished road
Hello,

First of all, temperature extrapolation error indicates something wrong in the energy solver, which can be caused by many reasons, such as poor grid resolution, wrong boundary conditions, improper spray model setup, etc. Since the error message gives you the location of the error spot, you can visualize it in STUDIO to figure out where exactly it is and what might be the cause.

Second, what type of boundary do you set for the sides? I don't quite understand what you meant by "zero normal gradient for both pressure and velocity". Does it suggest as inlet and outlet conditions (which I don't think is correct)? Instead, since you are using a sector, if the swirl motion is weak, you can use periodic bc there. Please make sure that the geometry and triangulation on the two sides are identical if the periodic bc is used.

If you still have troubles, please feel free to contact with us at support@convergecfd.com.

Quote:
Originally Posted by amrrhm View Post
Hi all,

Attached is top view of a heat exchanger I am trying to simulate. The piston moves downward and pushes the fluid to outlet through the fins. I would like to model only 10 deg (out of 360 degree of the whole geometry) for computational proficiency. I have used zero normal gradient for both pressure and velocity at both sides, but I get the following error:

temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction.

Also I get:
get_temp_from_sensible_sie problem found in rank 83 at cell 34069, located at <0.0215101, 0.020375, 0.122875 >, in region 0, whose level=10, ii=910, jj=473, kk=737

and the time steps decreases dramatically and it says: time-step limited by temperature extrapolation error, recovering

I am not sure if this error is related to the boundary condition or not. It would be appreciated if you would help me about this error and also let me know if the zero normal gradient is the proper BC for my purpose.

Thanks
xieshengbai is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2016, 17:21
Default
  #3
New Member
 
amrrhm
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 10
amrrhm is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your response, The periodic BC solved the problem.
amrrhm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 1, 2019, 17:50
Default Regarding error while running Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Sector CTC in converge
  #4
New Member
 
Iowa
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
Ahamed is on a distinguished road
I was running the case setup file for Internal_Combustion_Engines/ Heavy_Duty_Diesel/ Engine_sector_Diesel_CTC by changing the application type from crank-based to time-based and making the piston at rest to just see the fuel-drop interaction. I got error "temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction." I am stuck here.I have also attached the cvg file.

I was wondering if you could provide me a guidance on this. Your help will be highly appreciated.
Ahamed is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boundary condition


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shadow Wall and temperature norger FLUENT 10 September 28, 2019 12:43
UDF for Back-flow Temperature G340 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 3 August 21, 2013 05:56
Inlet won't apply UDF and has temperature at 0K! tccruise Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 2 September 14, 2012 07:08
Too low temperature at combustor outlet romekr FLUENT 2 February 6, 2012 11:02
difference of temperature HKH FLUENT 0 January 28, 2010 03:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:59.