|
[Sponsors] |
temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 25, 2016, 22:21 |
temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction
|
#1 |
New Member
amrrhm
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi all,
Attached is top view of a heat exchanger I am trying to simulate. The piston moves downward and pushes the fluid to outlet through the fins. I would like to model only 10 deg (out of 360 degree of the whole geometry) for computational proficiency. I have used zero normal gradient for both pressure and velocity at both sides, but I get the following error: temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction. Also I get: get_temp_from_sensible_sie problem found in rank 83 at cell 34069, located at <0.0215101, 0.020375, 0.122875 >, in region 0, whose level=10, ii=910, jj=473, kk=737 and the time steps decreases dramatically and it says: time-step limited by temperature extrapolation error, recovering I am not sure if this error is related to the boundary condition or not. It would be appreciated if you would help me about this error and also let me know if the zero normal gradient is the proper BC for my purpose. Thanks |
|
October 27, 2016, 11:01 |
|
#2 | |
Member
Shengbai Xie
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello,
First of all, temperature extrapolation error indicates something wrong in the energy solver, which can be caused by many reasons, such as poor grid resolution, wrong boundary conditions, improper spray model setup, etc. Since the error message gives you the location of the error spot, you can visualize it in STUDIO to figure out where exactly it is and what might be the cause. Second, what type of boundary do you set for the sides? I don't quite understand what you meant by "zero normal gradient for both pressure and velocity". Does it suggest as inlet and outlet conditions (which I don't think is correct)? Instead, since you are using a sector, if the swirl motion is weak, you can use periodic bc there. Please make sure that the geometry and triangulation on the two sides are identical if the periodic bc is used. If you still have troubles, please feel free to contact with us at support@convergecfd.com. Quote:
|
||
November 3, 2016, 17:21 |
|
#3 |
New Member
amrrhm
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 10 |
Thanks for your response, The periodic BC solved the problem.
|
|
October 1, 2019, 17:50 |
Regarding error while running Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Sector CTC in converge
|
#4 |
New Member
Iowa
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7 |
I was running the case setup file for Internal_Combustion_Engines/ Heavy_Duty_Diesel/ Engine_sector_Diesel_CTC by changing the application type from crank-based to time-based and making the piston at rest to just see the fuel-drop interaction. I got error "temperature is greater than max_temp in calc_temp_fraction." I am stuck here.I have also attached the cvg file.
I was wondering if you could provide me a guidance on this. Your help will be highly appreciated. |
|
Tags |
boundary condition |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shadow Wall and temperature | norger | FLUENT | 10 | September 28, 2019 12:43 |
UDF for Back-flow Temperature | G340 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 3 | August 21, 2013 05:56 |
Inlet won't apply UDF and has temperature at 0K! | tccruise | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 2 | September 14, 2012 07:08 |
Too low temperature at combustor outlet | romekr | FLUENT | 2 | February 6, 2012 11:02 |
difference of temperature | HKH | FLUENT | 0 | January 28, 2010 03:45 |