CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > CONVERGE

warning - extrapolating on temperature calculation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 2, 2016, 08:17
Default warning - extrapolating on temperature calculation
  #1
New Member
 
cedric ameloot
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
cedame is on a distinguished road
Hello,

[Using Converge 2.2.0]

I am simulating hot flow in a cylindric tube to study heat flow in the radial direction of the tube.
I am doing some kind of parametric study, where I have one fully working case setup.
No problems occured during setup, calculation and results interpretation of this first case.
In a second case I changed thermal conductivity of the tube material.
When I try to run this calculation, Converge gives me the line that I described in the title of this thread.

As I merely changed 1 parameter (the thermal conductivity of the tube material), I don't know where to start to debug my case setup.

Moreover, at every cycle Converge writes something like:
ncyc= 770, time= 9.625000000e-04, dt= 1.250000000e-06, time-step limit =dt_min forced by dt_recover

Where dt = 1.250000000e-06 is the minimum time step.
I see that Converge uses some kind of recovered time step, but I don't see where it gets it. Is the dt_recover the time step of the previous cycle ?

Converge continues running, but writes that it is extrapolating for temperature calculation, so I guess that this calculation is not exact enough.

Thanks in advance,
Cedric
cedame is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 2016, 13:28
Default
  #2
Member
 
xieshengbai's Avatar
 
Shengbai Xie
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 10
xieshengbai is on a distinguished road
Dear Cedric,

There might be many reasons to cause this warning message. Basically, it means something is wrong in the temperature calculation (either too high or too low). For example, maybe you changed the thermal conductivity too much such that the temperature drops or increases drastically falling out of the reasonable range.

The appearance of dt_recover means that the solver doesn't converge well. When the solver doesn't converge, CONVERGE has to go back to the last cycle and reduces the time-step size and retry it until it reaches the minimum time-step limit you set. It seems to me that the temperature is not converged in your case, as a response to the change of conductivity.

Hope it helps.

Shengbai
xieshengbai is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2016, 12:55
Default
  #3
New Member
 
cedric ameloot
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
cedame is on a distinguished road
Hello Shengbai,

Indeed, the sudden change in thermal conductivity was the problem.
I chose another value, closer to my initial case setup, and it works now.

Thank you for your help,

Cedric
cedame is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to use setField to create sphere sega OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 38 January 13, 2022 01:39
is internalField(U) equivalent to zeroGradient? immortality OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 March 29, 2013 02:27
where is the calculation of the temperature field Tobi OpenFOAM 1 July 30, 2012 11:40
Can anybody help me to solve the list errors while compiling Openfoam 15 on Opensuse 103 32bit coompressor OpenFOAM Installation 0 November 12, 2008 20:53
OpenFOAM14 for Mac OSX Darwin 104 gschaider OpenFOAM Installation 118 July 20, 2008 06:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35.