|
[Sponsors] |
June 1, 2015, 16:53 |
Weak Contribution - COMSOL
|
#1 |
New Member
Brandon
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am looking to implement a surface stress via a weak contribution in COMSOL using the "Two-Phase Flow Laminar Mesh" physics module. My model is a 2-D axis symmetric model.
The equation governing the stress on the surface is: Where M is the magnetization of the liquid and mu is a universal constant. The equivalent form using COMSOL variable notation is: 0.5*mu0_const*(down(mfnc.Mr)*nr + down(mfnc.Mz)*nz)^2 However, I realize that this is not sufficient. I believe the solution is to implement this using the weak form of the equation. Can anyone guide me in the direction to implement this equation. What I have now is: 0.5*mu0_const*(down(mfnc.Mr)*nr + down(mfnc.Mz)*nz)^2*sign(down(mfnc.Mr)*nr + down(mfnc.Mz)*nz)*(test(u)*(tpfmm.nr-u) + test(w)*(tpfmm.nz - w)) The bold term there is an addition that I don't completely understand and ended up grabbing from another form. I am pretty sure it is wrong. Thanks in advance for any help. |
|
Tags |
comsol, weak contribution, weak form |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
COMSOL Conference 2011: Call for Paper | teguhtf | COMSOL | 2 | June 13, 2011 04:56 |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
pressure distribution in water flow, differences in icoFoam and COMSOL | deniggo | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | September 30, 2010 04:48 |
comsol weak formulation | Olga | COMSOL | 0 | December 10, 2007 14:39 |
COMSOL weak formulation | Das | COMSOL | 0 | May 9, 2006 20:16 |