|
[Sponsors] |
Quantifying the swirl in CFX, Swirl Number/Swirl Angle |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 1, 2012, 02:06 |
|
#21 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Have a look in my PhD thesis - http://hdl.handle.net/2100/248
See page 74, in the literature review. |
|
May 2, 2012, 23:35 |
|
#22 | |
New Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
||
May 3, 2012, 00:48 |
|
#23 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
I mentioned this because I wanted to make the point that there is no universal definition of swirl number. It is defined based on what makes sense in the application.
In IC engines it makes a lot of sense to normalise against crankshaft velocity as it is the scaling factor on all engine flows. But for a GT this may not be the case, so an equivalent swirl number normalised by shaft speed may be meaningless. |
|
July 24, 2016, 23:28 |
|
#24 | |
New Member
zhenmu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
I confused for CEL equation. The W in the swirl number equation is tangential velocity. So, why you use sqrt((Velocity u^2)+(Velocity w^2)) for the W ? Why isn't velocity u or velocity w used for W? |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
angle of attack CFX | Arj | CFX | 17 | October 2, 2015 08:07 |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
Proper output of angle of attack in CFX post | Kevin | CFX | 3 | October 18, 2006 13:18 |
Angle measurement in CFX | sham | CFX | 0 | September 2, 2006 01:26 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |