|
[Sponsors] |
November 13, 2011, 12:19 |
Liquid Water Free Surface Evaporation
|
#1 |
New Member
Neal Wannell
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
I am trying to implement interfacial component transfer between liquid water and air.
I have a 50m high cylinder with a radius of 15m, where the bottom and side walls are modelled as no slip walls. The top is modelled as an opening with a 0atm relative pressure and a temperature of 298K. I have succesfully been able to create two homogeneous phases with a clear free surface at the interface by simply creating two fluid types in the domain. Buoyancy and thermal heat transfer is included, but I further wish to couple the two phases to allow water to evaporate into the air after placing an point energy souce by the surface. How can I go about coupling the phases? Thanks |
|
November 13, 2011, 17:52 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
What does the free surface do? Is it always flat or close to it? Does it go up and down? Or does it have waves, splashing and/or foam?
Each of these different states should be modelled differently. |
|
November 14, 2011, 01:38 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Neal Wannell
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
For now I just have it as a stationary free surface. Am I right in thinking that I will have to create 3 materials. The liquid water, Air- water vapour mixture and water liquid-vapour mixture?
I tried to go about this way, but I couldn't seem to find the option for component interfacial transfer. I wish to model it through Raoult's law. |
|
November 14, 2011, 01:38 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Neal Wannell
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
For now I just have it as a stationary free surface. Am I right in thinking that I will have to create 3 materials. The liquid water, Air- water vapour mixture and water liquid-vapour mixture?
I tried to go about this way, but I couldn't seem to find the option for component interfacial transfer. I wish to model it through Raoult's law. Thanks very much for replying |
|
November 14, 2011, 06:18 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
If the interface is stationary then I would consider having them as separate domains and not use a multiphase model at all. Then you can impose the free surface transfer functions as interface conditions.
Even if the interface moves up and down you can do this with moving mesh. But if waves, churning, foaming or bubbles are important this approach will not work. |
|
January 3, 2015, 02:45 |
|
#6 |
New Member
kathleen
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi all,
I am currently trying to simulate something extremely similar to njw's case. It is an evaporation from water in a open cylinder heated from the sides. The temperature of the bulk fluid does not exceed boiling point(saturated temperature), so there is only heat transfer by convection in the cylinder, with evaporation at the top open end of the pipe. However, one difference from njw's case is that the free water surface will be gradually moving downwards as water evaporates from the cylinder. The cylinder is thin, around 5mmx0.5m. Hence, mass loss by evaporation will have a significant impact on the water level. Does any one have any advice on how I can model the evaporation at the top surface? Thank you so much in advance. |
|
January 3, 2015, 05:43 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Why are you modelling this with CFD? Why can't you just model this with simple control volume approaches?
|
|
January 5, 2015, 10:10 |
|
#8 |
New Member
kathleen
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Sir, thank you for you reply. Sorry but could you explain how I can go about solving this by control volume method? Or do you have any references that you would recommend? The heat transfer texts I can find at does not seem to have a method for solving this problem.
Thank you in advance! |
|
January 5, 2015, 12:09 |
|
#9 | |
Senior Member
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
I've done a simulation like this with success. The steady state solution is an empty tank. So you must be interested in the transient. What are you hoping to achieve from the simulation? |
||
January 5, 2015, 17:08 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Treat the liquid domain as a control volume, with a specified volume and temperature. Work out the temperature change, the evaporation (mass loss) and volume change for that time step, and iterate over time. Simple(ish), and no CFD required.
|
|
March 20, 2015, 05:41 |
|
#11 |
New Member
farzaneh babaei
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi
My project is modeling of surface evaporation in dams, Can i model the evaporation by using CFD? Many people told me you can not do this. can you help me about this problem? Thank you so much . |
|
March 20, 2015, 05:48 |
|
#12 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
You can model evaporation in CFX. But the question is more: If you are modelling evaporation in a dam do you need a CFD solver to do it?
Why do you want to model evaporation in a dam? What will you learn other than that the water slowly moves from the dam into the air and the water level slowly goes down? |
|
March 20, 2015, 05:59 |
|
#13 |
New Member
farzaneh babaei
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
my aim is to show that water storage behind dams evaporate more quickly than when water flowing on the ground .
|
|
March 20, 2015, 07:48 |
|
#14 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
What physical process makes dams evaporate faster?
|
|
March 20, 2015, 07:54 |
|
#15 |
New Member
farzaneh babaei
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
when the thickness of (height of ) water is too high
|
|
March 21, 2015, 04:54 |
|
#16 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
How does the water height increase the evaporation rate?
|
|
March 28, 2015, 12:22 |
Evaporation from a free-surface
|
#17 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi everyone,
I do have the same problem (evaporation from a free-surface) which I would like to solve with CFX. This is a simple problem of a 2D domain with the domain occupied by water and air (water and air are separated with a clear interface). The water and air never mix, so the homogeneous free-surface model is enough. The interface will move due to evaporation (and mass conservation). Please note I'm interested in CFD modeling of this problem not analytic solutions. I highly appreciate if anyone can let me know if they have ever solved this with CFX or are aware of any paper/article/video/tutorial that explains how to solve this with CFX. Thanks :-) |
|
March 29, 2015, 06:22 |
|
#18 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
I have never done this type of model. CFX should have the necessary models to do it. But do not be confused into thinking this is a simple simulation - multiphase with phase change mass transfer is never going to be straight forward.
Your best bet to get an example to start you off is to contact ANSYS support. |
|
March 29, 2015, 09:44 |
|
#19 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks for the reply.
I have to agree with you. This problem, although incredibly easy looking, is actually quite complex. And we also have problems with spurious currents around the interface. And in agreement with you, I think mass-transfer in multiphase flows is still on its R&D phase and is not quite robust yet. |
|
March 29, 2015, 19:14 |
|
#20 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Spurious currents at the interface is a common problem with free surface models with surface tension. So only turn the surface tension model on if you really need it.
I strongly disagree that mass transfer in multiphase flows is R&D only. There are many industries which use is successfully and accurately. But it needs a skillful, experienced CFD person to drive it and requires careful derivation and validation. You cannot simply press a button and mass transfer "just works". |
|
Tags |
evaporation, free surface |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Free water jet impinging hot solid surface, including boiling | hamdy | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 5 | August 19, 2012 20:52 |
Can Flow-3D plot the free surface area in Iso-surface or colour variable? | therockyy | FLOW-3D | 1 | June 20, 2010 20:36 |
Patch type for free surface of liquid | shchepan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | June 8, 2010 10:54 |
open channel problem (free surface) | Andy Chen | FLUENT | 4 | July 10, 2009 02:20 |
uptodate water distribution network | fredius,magige,tanzanian,(e.a) | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 27, 2002 08:10 |