|
[Sponsors] |
July 21, 2011, 17:51 |
|
#21 |
Member
vyc
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
hello,
I made two domain interface analysis one of them is moving other static. but then I check results I found that fluid do not flow from one interface side to other... Interface model: General Interface connection: GGI Additional Interface model: Side Dependent best regards Vytautas |
|
July 21, 2011, 20:29 |
|
#22 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
I have done this type of interface many times, it should work fine. There is something specific to your setup which is not working. Need more details to be of further assistance.
|
|
July 22, 2011, 12:28 |
|
#23 |
Member
vyc
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
hello
some info: FLOW: Flow Analysis 1 &replace DOMAIN INTERFACE: Domain Interface 1 Boundary List1 = Domain Interface 1 Side 1 Boundary List2 = Domain Interface 1 Side 2 Filter Domain List1 = Default Domain Filter Domain List2 = cilindrine dalis Interface Region List1 = static side Interface Region List2 = moving side Interface Type = Fluid Fluid INTERFACE MODELS: Option = General Connection FRAME CHANGE: Option = None END MASS AND MOMENTUM: Option = Free Slip Wall END PITCH CHANGE: Option = None END END MESH CONNECTION: Option = GGI INTERSECTION CONTROL: Face Intersection Depth Factor = 1 Face Search Tolerance Factor = 0.1 Option = Bitmap Permit No Intersection = On END END END First side: FLOW: Flow Analysis 1 DOMAIN: Default Domain &replace BOUNDARY: Domain Interface 1 Side 1 Boundary Type = INTERFACE Interface Boundary = On Location = static side BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: HEAT TRANSFER: Option = Conservative Interface Flux END MESH MOTION: Option = Specified Displacement DISPLACEMENT: Displacement X Component = 0 [m] Displacement Y Component = su funcijos duomenimis Displacement Z Component = 0 [m] Option = Cartesian Components END END THERMAL RADIATION: Option = Conservative Interface Flux END END NONOVERLAP CONDITIONS: Boundary Type = WALL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: HEAT TRANSFER: Heat Transfer Coefficient = 20 [W m^-2 K^-1] Option = Heat Transfer Coefficient Outside Temperature = 100 [C] END MASS AND MOMENTUM: Option = No Slip Wall Wall Velocity Relative To = Mesh Motion END MESH MOTION: Option = Specified Displacement DISPLACEMENT: Displacement X Component = 0 [m] Displacement Y Component = su funcijos duomenimis Displacement Z Component = 0 [m] Option = Cartesian Components END END THERMAL RADIATION: Diffuse Fraction = 1. Emissivity = 1. Option = Opaque END WALL ROUGHNESS: Option = Smooth Wall END END END END Second side: FLOW: Flow Analysis 1 DOMAIN: cilindrine dalis &replace BOUNDARY: Domain Interface 1 Side 2 Boundary Type = INTERFACE Interface Boundary = On Location = kur juda BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: HEAT TRANSFER: Option = Conservative Interface Flux END MESH MOTION: Option = Specified Displacement DISPLACEMENT: Displacement X Component = 0 [m] Displacement Y Component = su funcijos duomenimis Displacement Z Component = 0 [m] Option = Cartesian Components END END THERMAL RADIATION: Option = Conservative Interface Flux END END NONOVERLAP CONDITIONS: Boundary Type = WALL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: HEAT TRANSFER: Heat Transfer Coefficient = 10 [W m^-2 K^-1] Option = Heat Transfer Coefficient Outside Temperature = 100 [C] END MASS AND MOMENTUM: Option = No Slip Wall END MESH MOTION: Option = Specified Displacement DISPLACEMENT: Displacement X Component = 0 [m] Displacement Y Component = su funcijos duomenimis Displacement Z Component = 0 [m] Option = Cartesian Components END END THERMAL RADIATION: Diffuse Fraction = 1. Emissivity = 1. Option = Opaque END WALL ROUGHNESS: Option = Smooth Wall END END END END END END I have tried different set ups but all time the same thanks For help Vytautas |
|
July 22, 2011, 15:47 |
|
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 531
Rep Power: 21 |
Check the solver output. The domain interface intersection should be re-calculated each timestep and you should see the non-overlap fraction calculated and shown as non-zero.
|
|
July 23, 2011, 06:32 |
|
#25 |
Member
vyc
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
hello,
I check solution out put options but I have not see options :inersection recalculate each time step I use 13 version... In solver control tab there are some options Intersection control - but intersection recalculate each time step no... please hellp best regards Vytautas |
|
July 23, 2011, 07:27 |
|
#26 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
The interface model needs to be transient rotor stator to get it to recalculate the GGI each time step. You have selected general interface which is for a fixed interface.
|
|
July 23, 2011, 16:21 |
|
#27 |
Member
vyc
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
hello,
rotor and stator in straight line movement analysis ? I have read Ansys 12 training manual there are 3 tape of interface models: Translation periodicity- in my case NO Rotation periodicity -in my case NO General connection this is all what remand... frame changes -YES, Pitch change -YES or I under stud some thing wrong? waiting for replay Vytautas |
|
July 23, 2011, 16:31 |
|
#28 |
Member
vyc
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 15 |
hello
Can some body send require set ups for strait line transient moving... or any tutorial... please... I stuck in on it for too long... Vytautas |
|
July 24, 2011, 07:47 |
|
#29 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
I told you what you need. There should be options like frozen rotor and other rotationing domain types and transient rotor stator.
I seem to vaguely remember you need to set one domain to be rotating to access these options - in this case set the stationary domain to be rotating at 1e-10 rad/s or something like that. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 | Lord Kelvin | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | March 28, 2016 12:08 |
Full pipe 3D using icoFoam | cyberbrain | OpenFOAM | 4 | March 16, 2011 10:20 |
directMapped problem | panda60 | OpenFOAM Bugs | 4 | July 8, 2010 11:23 |
calculation diverge after continue to run | zhajingjing | OpenFOAM | 0 | April 28, 2010 05:35 |
AMG versus ICCG | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 7, 2006 16:15 |