|
[Sponsors] |
May 9, 2011, 23:39 |
Results are time step dependent
|
#1 |
New Member
Mayank Ojha
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello all,
I am trying to simulate a moving mesh problem where the motion is governed by fluid flow. i.e force_y()@Region:CYLINDER I created the mesh in ICEM and did a grid and time convergence study for a stationary cylinder at Re=100. The residuals have an rms of 1e-05. The results obtained were accurate for a stationary cylinder but when I used the same grid for mesh motion, the results (displacements) were time step dependent. getting close to correct results for tstep=0.01 but very low values for tstep=0.001 1.) In my case should the grid convergence be done for moving mesh or stationary mesh ??? Thank you very much. Mayank |
|
May 10, 2011, 20:00 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
It may well be that your moving mesh model requires a different time step size. Looks like you need to repeat the convergence study with the moving mesh model.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
HELP! time step too small? | meangreen | Main CFD Forum | 6 | May 31, 2018 11:41 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
directMapped problem | panda60 | OpenFOAM Bugs | 4 | July 8, 2010 11:23 |
unsteady calcs in FLUENT | Sanjay Padhiar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 31, 1999 13:32 |