|
[Sponsors] |
April 15, 2011, 00:30 |
How to deal with the "solid" in CFX
|
#1 |
New Member
eric
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi all,
Just want to discuss how to deal with the "solid" in CFX. I know there is an approach to use the high viscosity to freeze the liquid. However, this approach is not very good in my case, because there is still motion in the "solid", although the velocity in "solid" is relatively smaller than in liquid. Does anybody have other methods? ps: ghorrocks posted that "some have a moving front which has a sub-domain (or separate domain) behind it", which I totally don't understand. Can some explain it in detail? Thanks |
|
April 15, 2011, 07:52 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Don't dismiss the immersed solid approach because it does not sound exact. CFD is a whole pile of approximations and estimates piled on top of each other which, providing the approximations are close enough can simulate reality. Saying that one additional approximation (ie the immersed solid approach) renders the whole thing invalid is rubbish. You just need to make sure the immersed solid approach is valid your case and use it appropriately. Then the error is small enough that the results are useful.
You seem to quote me but I have no idea what it is about. You would have to put in the context of that quote. |
|
April 16, 2011, 02:10 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
eric
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply. Here is the address of your reply for another thread: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx...sting-cfx.html Actually my case is about a solid metal melts in a liquid pool. I don't know what is "immerse solid" approach. Would you please explain it further or recommend me some literature about this approach. Thanks very much. |
||
April 16, 2011, 08:26 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
As I said in the post, search the literature for the current ideas of how to model solidification.
But the basic idea on this approach is to track the solidification front and get the mesh to follow it. Then you have a solid domain behind, a liquid domain in front and some form of interface conditions to handle the solidification. Easy! (Not at all, this is going to be very tricky to implement, and even harder to get accurate.) |
|
April 16, 2011, 13:01 |
|
#5 |
New Member
eric
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks. ghorrocks.
This method seems to be suitable for simulating the rigid solid in liquid. We need to define two domains for the solid and liquid respectively. Is it possible to make the solid to melt in liquid? |
|
April 17, 2011, 08:31 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Yes, of course. But you will have to develop models for much of the physics yourself as this is not a built-in function for CFX. I think other packages (eg Flow3D) has solidification as a built-in function. I have no idea if it is any good, I have never used it.
|
|
April 17, 2011, 14:04 |
|
#7 |
New Member
eric
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 16 |
Thank you very much, Glenn
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
PhD using CFX | Rui | CFX | 9 | May 28, 2007 06:59 |
Can CFX deal with jet impinging problem? | prayskyer | CFX | 1 | September 4, 2006 18:04 |
Good Switch deal from CFX to Fluent | User who switches | CFX | 6 | May 17, 2006 14:00 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |