|
[Sponsors] |
March 25, 2011, 07:35 |
NACA0012 - High Resolution - No convergence
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi,
I can't get my solution to convergence when using the High Resolution solver and medium to fine grids. It only convergences on a very coarse grid. Using the Upwind scheme which lacks accuracy - the solution converges every time ! Mach number is 0.5 and angle of attack 2°. With High Resolution I even get negative pressure forces on the wing in x-direction, totally absurd. What might be the reasons for this behavior and how do I get it to converge ? Thank you ! |
|
March 25, 2011, 16:39 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 739
Rep Power: 26 |
Could you try running a high resolution scheme simulation with the results from the upwind scheme to initialise the solution?
|
|
March 25, 2011, 17:09 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
I tried that and failed.
However I managed to get it to work, I found out that while increasing the number of grid points in the far field and number of inflation layers I did not increase the number of grid points on my airfoil in the same manner. This resulted in long and very thin inflation layer cells, which seem to cause problems with the High Resolution Solver. So I added more points to my profile, decreased the amount of inflation layers and now everything works very well ! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to understand high resolution scheme and high order scheme | iilw1314 | Main CFD Forum | 7 | April 12, 2022 13:29 |
high resolution scheme | az_f | CFX | 0 | November 24, 2010 23:52 |
larger blend factor or high resolution ? | amine | CFX | 2 | March 4, 2008 21:28 |
upwind vs high resolution | Richard | CFX | 3 | February 20, 2006 07:35 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |