|
[Sponsors] |
March 18, 2011, 12:47 |
Inlet pressure vs mass flow diference
|
#1 |
New Member
Miroslav
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello everybody,
I am trying to make calculation of flow in turbocharger, I have one rotary domain there, but I have discover that when I set up mass flow BC on inlet and in res file I calculate pressure on inlet and than i set this pressure as a total or static (tryed both ) pressure on inlet I get dífferent values of mass flow in second case. Can you help me dicover what is going on ? |
|
March 20, 2011, 22:10 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Did you average the pressure, or keep the pressure distribution over the inlet patch?
|
|
March 21, 2011, 04:39 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Miroslav
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi
I calculated avagare pressure. One possibilities is that I/O pressure to pressure is no so strongly defined than the mass flow on inlet and it gives to solver some freedom to get equilibrium. My model is qiute complicated, 4 domain , 1 static interfaces and 2 frozen rotors. What do you think about this assumption ? Thanks M. |
|
March 21, 2011, 20:29 |
|
#4 | |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Quote:
If you are applying a constant pressure across the boundary then that is an obvious difference to the mass flow inlet where pressure varies across the boundary. |
||
March 23, 2011, 04:55 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Miroslav
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Yeah Glenn, you are right that the comparison of pressure from BC (constant value) and the pressures from .res with BC mass -> P2 when P1 is changing across the boundary brings some mistake, but difference was much bigger. I was wondering if somebody has some experience with this efect. (Big difference between inlet pressure if it is set as BC or if it is calculated as a result of mass flow on inlet BC, I have to doublecheck that all cases had been converged enought, but i do not think there can be a problem ). We have made some measurement in real condition, and results from calculation was much more close to it , when I used mass-> P2 BCs.
|
|
March 24, 2011, 00:34 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
J_A
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Hope to help |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Target Mass Flow Rate | Nitin | FLUENT | 9 | June 17, 2017 11:30 |
Compressible flow, no data at the outlet | mireis | FLUENT | 6 | September 3, 2015 03:10 |
static pressure from mass flow rate | SAM | FLUENT | 5 | October 22, 2004 10:37 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |
Mass flow inlet B.C. at exit... | Jack Keays | FLUENT | 2 | October 6, 2000 09:39 |