|
[Sponsors] |
February 9, 2011, 05:30 |
Cell Reynolds number in Multiphase
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17 |
How can i find the cell Reynolds Number in multiphase problems.
I need that number ( Reynolds Number) in order to calculate the interfacial friction coefficient (free surface flows) Thanks Jessica |
|
February 9, 2011, 06:37 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Simply define a user variable with the definition of Cell Reynolds number in it. You can do this in CFD-Post providing you included enough variables in your output file.
|
|
February 9, 2011, 06:59 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17 |
i don t need this in post.. i need it in CFX PRE in order to calculate locally this friction coefficient.
|
|
February 9, 2011, 19:24 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
It will work in the solver as well. What do you want to do with it? Look at it in the results file or use it to calculate some flow thing?
|
|
February 10, 2011, 04:34 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17 |
Please how shall i write it in piece of which hydraulic diameter? I need this as said already two times before, to calculate the friction coefficient on the interphase. My Problem is this hydraulic diameter pr any specific length .
By means oh that coefficient i can furthermore estimate the drag coeffcient for the mixture model. |
|
February 10, 2011, 05:13 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
There is no universal definition of cell Reynolds number. Also, cell Reynolds number is usually used to assess the accuracy of numerical schemes (ie Peclet number) so I have no idea why you are trying to use it for a physical model.
|
|
February 10, 2011, 05:20 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17 |
then i need any kind of Reynlods number forget about the cell one.
|
|
February 10, 2011, 07:01 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
I think you need to read up about Reynolds Number. Time to get out the Fluid Mechanics textbook, or even wikipedia.
|
|
February 10, 2011, 07:52 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17 |
??? i am only asking.. do you think i dunno the definition of the Reynolds number.
I am making my Phd MR know better than you.. I am discovering that if you don t have a reply to a question you start to think that the others are beginners or something... thanks for your reply, however. Jessica: Engineer at RWE Power. |
|
February 10, 2011, 18:07 |
|
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
Puzzling...
Anyway, Reynolds number is simply Density*Velocity*Length/Viscosity. You can use any definition of density, velocity, length and viscosity you like. For flow over a cylinder taking the diameter as the length scale and the free stream velocity as the velocity makes sense. For flow over a plate, a length scale of the length along the plate makes sense. So there is no universal definition of Reynolds number. It has to be defined in context with what you are doing. And comparisons of Reynolds number where the definitions are different is meaningless. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cell Reynolds Number | laliong | Main CFD Forum | 12 | September 17, 2019 04:18 |
FvMatrix coefficients | shrina | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | October 3, 2013 15:38 |
Low Reynolds Number k-epsilon formulation CFX 10.0 | Chris | CFX | 4 | December 8, 2009 00:51 |
Warning 097- | AB | Siemens | 6 | November 15, 2004 05:41 |
cell number in radpro.f ? | Ossi | Siemens | 1 | April 5, 2002 08:48 |