|
[Sponsors] |
buoyancy - losses estimation through total pressure |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 29, 2010, 15:07 |
buoyancy - losses estimation through total pressure
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi everyone
As a test, I'm simulating a basic vertical cylinder, with uniform normal water flow at entrance and zero averaged pressure at outlet. Reynolds number is ~2000 - When buyoancy is off, by calculating total pressure difference between inlet and outlet I get losses that corresponds to what can be expected from theory - when buoyancy is on : computing losses by total pressure difference gives a very different value (*20 !). Computing losses by difference of (abs pressure+cinetic energy) gives non physical results (negative losses...) I've checked hydrostatic pressure (abs. pressure - ref. pressure - pressure) and this is ok... what's going on ? and how do I compute losses in case of buoyancy ? thank you all in advance ! |
|
October 30, 2010, 12:32 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Tommy
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 16 |
If there's setting about reference density, you can make a test with reference density = 0.
|
|
November 1, 2010, 14:03 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 17 |
thanks
but I am not considering a multiphase flow, as only water is flowing in. So my density is fixed and constant (i am not considering temperature fluctuation either). This is really a simple test case, and results are puzzling to me... any other clue ? |
|
November 4, 2010, 13:10 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 196
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
||
November 10, 2010, 12:05 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
thanks for your contribution. I've understood that when buoyancy is on, absolute pressure = pref+pressure+hydrostatic pressure (this is what is said in CFX help). In fact I did a wrong calculation when buoyancy was on as my reference temperature was set in kelvin and not in celsius as I thought. Now that I fixed it, total pressure difference when buoyancy is on or off are the same. Therefore, I still have questions about hydrostatic contribution : when buoyancy is on, total pressure difference as defined by CFX (pressure without hydrostatic contribution + cinetic energy) between inlet and outlet should be regular losses + rho.g.deltaz and this is not the case, we get only regular losses. Could it be that when imposing boundary conditions, hydrostatic contribution is implied, therefore in the pressure field obtained, hydrostatic contribution is indeed included in PRESSURE ? Thanks. |
||
Tags |
buoyancy, losses, total pressure |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
total pressure change in a pipe flow | Im | FLUENT | 5 | February 23, 2017 09:55 |
conservative total pressure and density | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 0 | June 24, 2007 13:45 |
resistance & pressure losses | Jan | CFX | 0 | May 14, 2002 08:33 |
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet | chong chee nan | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2001 06:13 |
Static vs Total Pressure | Alfonso Ferrandez | FLUENT | 2 | May 23, 2000 09:53 |