|
[Sponsors] |
September 21, 2010, 08:11 |
Turbulence Numerics
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello everyone,
Can anyone explain for me the Turbulence Numerics High Resolution Scheme. thx |
|
September 21, 2010, 19:21 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,853
Rep Power: 144 |
By default CFX uses upwinding for the spatial differencing in the turbulence equations. The HR scheme uses a second order scheme and is potentially more accurate, but harder to converge.
|
|
September 22, 2010, 23:35 |
Hi
|
#3 |
Member
Dynampally Pavitran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: India
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 16 |
It is not always second order as it depends on the local solution field, it reduces to first order near discontinuities.
|
|
September 23, 2010, 03:37 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,853
Rep Power: 144 |
Very good, just checking somebody was paying attention
|
|
September 24, 2010, 03:41 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17 |
So, i started another case and unfortunately it is not the problem related to numeric. I think something goes wrong the partitioning of the mesh with few than 10 K cells.
tests are carried out... |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale | rizhang | CFX | 2 | April 22, 2016 08:22 |
Question on Turbulence Intensity | Eric | FLUENT | 1 | March 7, 2012 05:30 |
Vortex shedding, FSI-analysis, turbulence numerics | tallknuseren | CFX | 3 | May 10, 2010 05:31 |
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 15, 2009 10:52 |