|
[Sponsors] |
Missing Information in SST Transition Model Formulation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 13, 2010, 19:42 |
Missing Information in SST Transition Model Formulation
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 18 |
Good day, all -
I'm working on a paper and simulations requiring the gamma-theta transitional SST model. In the derivation of the model in the manual just after Equation (155), it reads: The model contains three empirical correlations. Re_theta_t is the transition onset as observed in experiments. This has been modified from Menter et al. [101] in order to improve the predictions for natural transition. It is used in Equation 151. F_length is the length of the transition zone and goes into Equation 143. Re_theta_c is the point where the model is activated in order to match both Re_theta_t and F_length; it goes into Equation 146. At present, these empirical correlations are proprietary and are not given in this manual. My problem is with the last line: "not given in this manual". Unfortunately, they are not given in the referenced paper, either (Menter et al., 2005). They are given in the original derivation (Menter et al., 2004), but, as noted above, they've been modified "in order to improve the predictions for natural transition". I found a relatively new paper ("Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes", Langtry and Menter, 2009) that gives the empirical correlations, but I'm unsure if these are the ones that are used in CFX. Are the correlations in the aforementioned paper (Langtry and Menter, 2009) the ones used in CFX? If not, does anyone know where they can be accessed? Thanks! |
|
September 14, 2010, 04:28 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
I am not aware of the 2009 paper you refer to so I cannot comment about what it contains. But my understanding is details like this are not published to protect CFX's IP. CFX is a commercial product and they want to make money out of it, so they give enough details so you get the general idea but not enough information so you can write you own software using their algorithm.
|
|
September 14, 2010, 12:49 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 18 |
Thanks, Glenn. I figured that was the answer, but I really didn't want to hear it.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implementation details of SST k-omega model | Niels | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 3, 2008 18:45 |
where to set CFX Transition Model? | steven | CFX | 6 | January 17, 2007 12:19 |
SST transitional turbulence model | Ben Akih | CFX | 3 | June 8, 2006 16:52 |
SST model help please! | Sheila | Siemens | 2 | September 6, 2004 23:39 |
k-omega model and unsteady transition | Jens Thurso | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 4, 1999 10:50 |