|
[Sponsors] |
Computational & Run Time requirements for CAA |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 16, 2010, 02:36 |
Computational & Run Time requirements for CAA
|
#1 |
New Member
Danillo Cafaldo dos Reis
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I'm a undergraduate student and I'm about to start a CAA research in CFX. I've no previous experience in this area, so in order to write my project I need to know the computational and run time requirements for a simple geometry. How many nodes would I need for a LES method? Please, any comment will be welcome. Thanks |
|
June 16, 2010, 09:22 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
It depends on what you are modelling, of course.
But any LES model will involve large meshes and long run times. LES is very computationally expensive. |
|
June 16, 2010, 11:16 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Danillo Cafaldo dos Reis
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Thank you Glenn Horrocks for your answer.
My first idea is to model an airfoil-slat geometry, but I thing I won't have enough computational resource to explore this problem in CFX, mainly because its iterative solver. Maybe a CAA designed software should allow me to do this. So in order to write my project I need to know what kind of geometry I will be able to explore in CFX. Thanks |
|
June 16, 2010, 11:21 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 16 |
Basically in a LES simulation you try to represent directly the large scales and the effects of the small scales are modelled. The required grid spacing h is proportional to a specified filter width that should be smaller than the size of the smallest energy-containing motions. you can see an overview of all modeling approaches in Pope for example.
Regards |
|
June 16, 2010, 19:38 |
|
#5 | |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Quote:
|
||
June 17, 2010, 19:07 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Danillo Cafaldo dos Reis
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Re~9e6 e Ma=0.3
|
|
June 17, 2010, 20:40 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
This is quite a high Re number, meaning that the turbulent structures will be quite small. On top of that you will have compressibility effects with Ma=0.3. This is definitely going to be a challenging model and will require a compute cluster of some size and lots of run time.
|
|
June 21, 2010, 20:01 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Danillo Cafaldo dos Reis
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Thank you Glenn Horrocks and Antonio for your answers.
I will change my initial idea and simulate a Mixing Layer, that can be interpreted as a very simplified model of slat. I'm sure that this will be possible to do. Best regards |
|
Tags |
aeroacoustics |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
Hydrostatic Pressure and Gravity | miliante | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 132 | October 7, 2012 23:50 |
Differences between serial and parallel runs | carsten | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | September 12, 2008 12:16 |
Total run time | Dominic | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 25, 2006 00:12 |
computational time dyn-mesh | mange | FLUENT | 0 | November 19, 2004 13:34 |