|
[Sponsors] |
June 11, 2010, 03:27 |
boundary conditions for cyclone separator
|
#1 |
New Member
siddharth
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16 |
i am doing a gas-solid simulation of cyclone separator. In the solution i get the mass is not balanced.
i have attached pics of the domain settings. can someone help me in showing where i went wrong or what is the correct settings? i have given a velocity inlet with both air and aluminium having 10m/s and air is 0.9 and aluminium is 0.1 volume fraction both overflow and underflow i have given pressure outlet with pressure of 0atm 1.jpg 2.JPG 3.JPG 4.JPG |
|
June 14, 2010, 19:20 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,850
Rep Power: 144 |
Please show your convergence results, and maybe post the CCL file.
|
|
June 15, 2010, 04:07 |
|
#3 |
New Member
siddharth
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16 |
i have attached the ccl file
Thanks in advance siddharth ----------------------------- cyclone_multiphase_v5_1.zip |
|
June 15, 2010, 07:53 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,850
Rep Power: 144 |
You are using a Reynolds Stress turbulence model. If you go to SST or some other more stable turbulence scheme it will be much more stable.
|
|
June 15, 2010, 08:11 |
|
#5 |
New Member
siddharth
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16 |
but most of the journal i had studied suggested that Reynolds stress turbulence model is most suitable for cyclone separator
Thanks siddharth |
|
June 15, 2010, 08:18 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,850
Rep Power: 144 |
It is, but it will make convergence extremely difficult.
Get the basic model working with SST. Once everything is working with SST then switch back to RSM. Also keep in mind that multiphase modelling introduces large simplifications. These simplifications can swamp the extra accuracy gained by RSM models. So if you have a have heavy multiphase interaction then I probably would not bother with RSM at all. |
|
June 15, 2010, 08:53 |
|
#7 |
New Member
siddharth
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16 |
will look into it.
I have one more doubt. In the basic settings of the Domain -- Air is the continuous fluid. what should i define aluminium? cause i am confused in giving it as continuous fluid or dispersed solid or particle transport solid. Thanks siddharth |
|
June 15, 2010, 09:01 |
|
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,850
Rep Power: 144 |
For a full answer to that question do a multiphase modelling course.
The quick answer is - light particle loadings - use particle tracking, heavy particle loadings use a Eularian approach. |
|
Tags |
cfx, cyclones separator |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions | Anindya | Main CFD Forum | 25 | February 27, 2016 13:58 |
[Netgen] boundary conditions and mesh exporting | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | May 27, 2010 10:38 |
Pressure boundary conditions | Lionel S. | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 24, 2007 19:03 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |
A problem about setting boundary conditions | lyang | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 19, 1999 19:29 |