CFX steady simulation

gharek · April 7, 2010, 09:24

Hi CFD users,

I am rather confused by the steady simulation in CFX. I'm using CFX 12.1. As far as I know, when assuming steady conditions, all the D(phi)/Dt terms are set to be equal to zero. Why is there a time step in CFX steady simulation?

So, if I am solving an unsteady and/or turbulent flow by assuming steady, would I get my residuals as fluctuating or divergent?

As far as I know from Fluent, there is no such timestep used for steady calculations.

Thanks for any advice.

ghorrocks · April 7, 2010, 19:41

This is all explained in the documentation. The solver takes a psuedo-time stepping approach to convergence. Many other solvers take a under-relaxation approach to convergence and hence no time step is required - but you need to set under relaxation factors instead.

In CFX it is psuedo-time stepping as not all the transient terms are included and different equations can be advanced at different rates.

April 7, 2010, 09:24	CFX steady simulation	#1
gharek New Member Gareth Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Sydney Aus Posts: 14 Rep Power: 16	Hi CFD users, I am rather confused by the steady simulation in CFX. I'm using CFX 12.1. As far as I know, when assuming steady conditions, all the D(phi)/Dt terms are set to be equal to zero. Why is there a time step in CFX steady simulation? So, if I am solving an unsteady and/or turbulent flow by assuming steady, would I get my residuals as fluctuating or divergent? As far as I know from Fluent, there is no such timestep used for steady calculations. Thanks for any advice.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Small cluster configuration for pump simulation at CFX	Nevel	Hardware	2	April 7, 2014 07:07
steady simulation	Rogerio Fernandes Brito	CFX	5	August 9, 2008 21:22
2D simulation - ICEM meshing for CFX question	Ben Makhal	CFX	5	April 11, 2007 09:44
Simulation of turbine cascade in CFX.	Jonas Pedro Caumo	CFX	0	December 9, 2006 14:54
mesh from Workbench Simulation to Cfx Pre?	Dai	CFX	6	November 11, 2006 13:19

April 7, 2010, 19:41		#2
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,854 Rep Power: 144	This is all explained in the documentation. The solver takes a psuedo-time stepping approach to convergence. Many other solvers take a under-relaxation approach to convergence and hence no time step is required - but you need to set under relaxation factors instead. In CFX it is psuedo-time stepping as not all the transient terms are included and different equations can be advanced at different rates.