CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

CFX 12.1: y+ value for SST

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree26Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 11, 2016, 02:47
Default
  #21
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
My recommendation is to use SST unless you know a specific reason not to.

In your case the rotational effects might cause a problem, but I would try with the curvature correction model with SST before I considered any other turbulence model.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2016, 05:01
Default
  #22
Member
 
ngoc tran bao
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 10
ngoc_tran_bao is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much for your recommend, Ghorrocks. I have tried to refine the mesh at all walls by creating 10 layers of inflation to get the value Y+ of 1 and apply SST turbulence model. It is harder to get convergence than K-e model but I believe it will be alright. By the way, I have another question about head loss, you know beside friction there are many types of head loss in the pump such as volumetric loss, hydraulic loss and so on. Is there any way to apply those loss in our simulation i order to make the result to be more accurate, Sir?
ngoc_tran_bao is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2016, 08:01
Default
  #23
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The whole idea of CFD is that you do not need to define these factors as the CFD model works it out based on the flow conditions.

If you wish to apply all those loss factors then you are doing a system level model, not CFD.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2016, 16:23
Default Is it right value?
  #24
New Member
 
ozturk sancaktar
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
ozturk is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I am analizing 3d naca airfoil. I use k-w SST and my Re 4.1e+7. I want to learn drag and lift over airfoil. Airflow velocity is 210 m/s. I desired y+ value 1 and calculate my first wall (infilation) height is 5.2e-6 . My infilation number is 45. After I runned my case, I plotted my y+ value over airfol is between 0,05 and 0,68. Is this value suitable for calculating right drag and lift?
Thank you.
Regards
ozturk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2016, 21:51
Default
  #25
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
You cannot say from a simple y+ number whether your mesh is adequate. You should do a mesh sensitivity study to determine whether your mesh is accurate enough for your purposes or not.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2016, 04:56
Default
  #26
New Member
 
ozturk sancaktar
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
ozturk is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your quick reply,
You said I should do a mesh sensitivity study; I should run different mesh elements number.
I calculated my case between 2000000 and 4500000 elements and then my max skewness nearly 0.95 . Before I said you, I desired my y+ value 1; but my results between 0.05 and 0.65, it is under 1 . It is not exactly 1. I want to ask these:
1. My solution model k-w STT is true?
2. My desired y+ value 1 is true?
3. After calculation I have to catch 1 y+ value, if it is lower 1, is it problem?
Thank you.
Regards.
ozturk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2016, 05:37
Default
  #27
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
y+<1 is a guide for what is required for SST to do integration to the wall with reasonable accuracy. But note that if you can use wall functions (and many flows can) then you are aiming for y+>11. So do not simply assume you need a small y+ and wall functions are much easier to use and work for many flows.

In my experience as the mesh is refined and the y+ gets smaller the results get more accurate. But there will be a point where numerical round off errors start becoming important and that means that further mesh refinement will lead to divergence. So there is a lower limit on mesh refinement. And the lower limit also varies between simulations.
ozturk likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2016, 06:07
Default
  #28
New Member
 
ozturk sancaktar
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
ozturk is on a distinguished road
I understood that: I think my way is true. Because I do not use k-epsilon ( wall function ). I use k-w STT so for my y+ value 1 is right desired value.
Thank you again.
Regards
ozturk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2016, 09:55
Default
  #29
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Because you are using SST does NOT mean you then have to have y+=1. If you are using automatic wall functions it will automatically transition from wall functions to integrating to the wall. You should try a y+ which will give wall functions and see if it works in your situation.
ozturk likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2016, 09:55
Default
  #30
New Member
 
ozturk sancaktar
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
ozturk is on a distinguished road
Hi,
Again I am here
Maybe you can remember my model is 3d airfoil. I analize cd nad cl coefficient. I want to ask that I write the area which looking airfoil through y axis. I know this is true for cl coefficient but I am not sure for cd.
For cd it maybe looking through x axis.
Thank you.
ozturk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2019, 05:36
Default Why should y+ be around 1?
  #31
New Member
 
Sven
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Blauwal is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone!

I'm barely new in CFD and currently working with cfx on my first study. Because i have to write a report for my university I would like to explain why I took a y + value of 1.

I tried to understand the theory of delta y the viscose sublayer etc. but in short words or better related on any paper is there anything you could recommend? i do not want to explain it in detail but relate me on something.


Thank you in advance!!!
Blauwal is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2019, 07:23
Default
  #32
Senior Member
 
karachun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 12
karachun is on a distinguished road
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJDYtEGMgzs
karachun is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL Val Main CFD Forum 3 June 10, 2011 03:20
Importing solutions in CFX. Alphonso CFX 1 August 1, 2008 15:01
PhD using CFX Rui CFX 9 May 28, 2007 06:59
CFX 10 VS CFX 11 for combustion Jonathan Lemay CFX 2 May 9, 2007 12:58
CFX 4.4 installation problem Pandu Sattvika CFX 1 December 1, 2001 05:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36.