|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
i'm modeling free surface flow in a rectangular channel by CFX 12. CFX calculates secondary flows inverse. this false calculation result in false velocity field (my last thread). dose anybody know waht's the reason of this wrong result? i attached a pic.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
|
please help
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Salam
I dont have this idea! Beacause in my simulation, it is correct. But the number of it is incorrect(Instead of 3 in half of section,it is only 2). Perhaps your bundary condition is incorrect. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
|
what kind of boundry condition are you using?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
I use static pressure in inlet stead Normal speed.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
You must see Tominaga's Paper. I think yours is incorret, Both of direction and location of them,base on this paper I tell it. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
|
i found that CFX calculates secondary currents like close channels (ducts). i dont know why!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
? What are you saying? If the Navier Stokes equations say secondary flows exist then if CFX is running well it will predict secondary flows. So what are you asking?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
|
directions of secondary currents in ducts (close channel) and open channel are different. this different is related to free surfce effect. the direction of ducts' secondary currents are in contrast with open channel and CFX dosen't calculate the free surface effect.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Fatema Zandi Goharrizi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Quote:
if we can not get a right answer to our problem that doesn't mean cfx is in a wrong way! (if it happens we can challenge with ANSYS cfx team) of course there is something with our modeling (or ghoflshekastegi barname bekhatere aberu finglish neveshtam!!!). check all things with a sample that exists (catched from someone who had good answers) or change the conditions and data and test them in a simple run to catch right answer then use conditions. good luck Last edited by zandi; March 1, 2010 at 14:20. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
|
hi miss.
doctor bonakdary said that he has worked with a version of CFX before version 10. and it wasn't able to calculate the channel and roughness of the channel. he reported that problem to Ansys and they sent him version 10 beta to be examined by him. no one has obtained such answer i need. why do you think these software always give right answers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Fatema Zandi Goharrizi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
ok
you know miss Tajnesaie. she has the similar project, if i'm right. did you test the static pressure in the inlet instead of normal velocity? if you insist on wrong answering of cfx why don't you share it with ansys, too? anyway I’m looking forward and will be glad to hear from your solution Last edited by zandi; March 1, 2010 at 17:29. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
|
yes i know her. she used static pressure at inlet and outlet. what about flow's velocity. in that way we can't control velocity of inflow or outflow. i investigating an experimental research and i need to put a certain velocity at inlet or outlet. and about reporting to ANSYS, it's reason is exactly ghofl shekastegi.
regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
hi,can you tell me how to get secondary flow vector filed in cfx?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,885
Rep Power: 27 ![]() |
- Create a plane perpendicular to main flow.
- Plot vectors on this plane - Set projection to tangential - Change symbol size (and colour) of you vectors to get something feizaghaee generated. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
ok,i will try it. thanks a lot
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 02:20 |
CFX 5 turbulence benchmark | Bart Prast | CFX | 16 | April 5, 2002 02:55 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 04:07 |
CFX vs STAR-CD and Fluent | William | CFX | 20 | October 29, 2001 13:55 |
CFD Short Course & CFX User Day | Chris Reeves | CFX | 0 | September 11, 2000 08:53 |