|
[Sponsors] |
December 2, 2009, 12:57 |
Gradient Discretization CFX vs Fluent
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
I am a traditional Fluent user trying to compare CFX runs to Fluent runs.
A few versions ago Fluent added an option under discretization for gradients 1) Green-Gauss Node based 2) Green-Gauss Cell based 3) Least Squares Cell based I am having trouble finding help on 1) does CFX have similar options 2) what is CFXs default If a simple answer exists (i.e. CFX only does #2 from the list above) that would be great. Thanks in advance |
|
December 2, 2009, 17:46 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
The approach in CFX is totally different to Fluent. Fluent is cell-centred so the gradients need to be calculated at the cell boundaries and hence the options you list. CFX uses a semi-Finite Element approach with shape functions. See the theory manual in the documentation for more details.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX or FLuent? | michelle | CFX | 7 | June 10, 2014 08:38 |
Fluent and CFX | Ale | Main CFD Forum | 7 | July 30, 2008 22:14 |
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 05:13 |
Reynolds Stress Model in Fluent Vs CFX | Tim | FLUENT | 0 | December 6, 2005 23:03 |
CFX vs STAR-CD and Fluent | William | CFX | 20 | October 29, 2001 14:55 |