|
[Sponsors] |
Free surface is below than expected..results are not good |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 15, 2009, 18:36 |
|
#21 | |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Quote:
Why do you think surface tension is important? It usually is not significant for large length scales. If you want to make surface tension a function of temperature then obviously you need to model the energy equation. This will add significant complexity and instability to the model, only do this if its contribution is significant. I recommend you start with constant surface tension (and isothermal) before tackling the more difficult varying temperature/surface tension simulation. The reference in the documentation describes how the compressive discretisation scheme find the free surface. Also I think there a description of the surface tension approach in the documentation. |
||
November 16, 2009, 09:45 |
|
#22 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 17 |
hi are you sure that i need the energy equation? it is q=n*delta(h)?
i have a laminar flow so i think it is RE as non-dimension number. how did the solver know that i actually declared the surface tension by the expressions? the surface tension-curve as function of the temperature is that what i have to implement!so itīs very important to me to know how the surface tension is changing during the flow. i have first of all a water film on a platt . this platt has 2 different temperatures(2 bottoms),my flow is laminar. later i will modelling a polymersolution! |
|
November 16, 2009, 19:03 |
|
#23 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
You don't know what the energy equation is, you don't know what the Re number is.... Sounds like you need to learn some basic fluid mechanics. I would forget about modelling surface tension and polymerisation until you know the basics.
|
|
April 8, 2011, 01:17 |
different result
|
#24 |
New Member
Iqbal, Muhammad
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 15 |
dear all,, what do you think,,
i ran free surface flow on ship at 7 knot and 9 knot,, and the result of force x on ship on 7 knot in negative but on 9 knot is positive.. which is true..?? please answer,, and thanks before.. |
|
April 8, 2011, 01:41 |
|
#25 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Probably neither.
Please do not hijack threads. Start a new thread for a new question. |
|
Tags |
free surface, unsatisfactory results |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bubblze induced turbulence at a free surface ???? | thomas | Main CFD Forum | 6 | April 21, 2012 10:48 |
Free surface height v/s time | ashish | CFX | 2 | October 4, 2005 15:13 |
free surface display | novice | Siemens | 5 | August 4, 2004 02:07 |
Free Surface Flows / Ocean Waves / Far-field boundary conditions | Sundar Prasad | Main CFD Forum | 5 | May 4, 1999 11:25 |
Code with reliable free surface capability in a rotating system | Subhasish Roy Choudhury | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 4, 1998 19:47 |