|
[Sponsors] |
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 10, 2009, 05:58 |
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale
|
#1 |
New Member
Yang Zhang
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi, everyone:
I have a question about turbulence length scale and integral length scale. I am right now doing a CFD simulation about Wind Turbine by using CFX with kappa-Omega 2-Equation turbulence model. In order to specify the turbulence level at the inlet (about 20% turbulence intensity ), i need to give the value of turbulence length scale and turbulence kinetic energy. But, i just know the intergral length scale at the inlet which is equal the chord length of the blade. How can i convert the integral length scale into turbulence length scale. Another method is that i can give the value of kinetic energy (kappa) and turbulence frequency (Omega). But, in order to calculate the omega, i need to know eddy viscosity ratio. Dose anyone know the eddy viscosity ratio of water at temperature 20° C? Thank you very much regards yang PS: i am using kappa-omega model and with very high turbulence level (20%) Last edited by rizhang; September 10, 2009 at 06:13. Reason: refinement |
|
September 10, 2009, 07:38 |
|
#2 | |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,852
Rep Power: 144 |
Quote:
This is a function of the local turbulence conditions, not a material property. A value of 10 or 100 is often used when you have no idea but that is nothing more than a guess of a value in the typical range. |
||
April 22, 2016, 08:22 |
Filter-based turbulence model (FBM)
|
#3 |
New Member
ahmed bel hadj taher
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: mahdia
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
The filter size is set to values which are smaller than the length scales returned by the conventional RANS models. Specifically, the level of the turbulent viscosity is corrected by comparing the turbulence length scale and the filter size Δ, which is based on the local meshing spacing:
μt_FBM= ((Cμ*ρm*k^2)/ε)*f_FBM with f_FBM= min(1,(∆.ε)/k^(3/2) ) with ∆=max(∆_present,∆_grid) my question is about the variables in CFX that can be introduced in place of ∆_present and ∆_grid thank you |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Integral Length Scale vs Turbulent Length Scale | Scott Nordsen | FLUENT | 2 | January 20, 2014 02:17 |
estimation of integral time scale | Clementine | FLUENT | 0 | February 28, 2008 12:29 |
LES inlet length scale | f.neilson | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 31, 2005 14:26 |
Von Karman Integral Length Scale | Txingurri | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 2, 2002 13:05 |
Turbulence integral lengthscale and mixing-length | Ray | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 12, 2001 20:51 |