|
[Sponsors] |
September 8, 2009, 19:02 |
Meshing Domains of Very Different Sizes
|
#1 |
New Member
Claudio
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I am new to Ansys and CFX and I haven't been able to resolve this issue. I'm modelling flow through a cylindrical duct in which there is a cylindrical obstacle, leaving a small gap between the obstacle and walls of the duct for the fluid to flow thorugh. The duct radius is 25 mm, while the obstacle radius is 24.45 mm. Thus, the gap is only 0.55 mm wide. I'm having trouble meshing this geometry in Ansys. Is there any way I can have greater control of the mesh inside the gap? I was thinking, one option was to create a separate domain for the fluid in the gap, and limit the mesh element size in order to have a finer mesh there, and use fluid-fluid interfaces to connect that domain to the rest of the duct. Does this sound right to you or would there be a better way to do it? |
|
September 9, 2009, 01:24 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Any geometry with a large range in dimensions is tricky to mesh. Do the tutorial examples and maybe some training in the meshing and that will help.
Generally it is preferable to have the mesh contiguous but you can split it up and link with GGIs if necessary. |
|
September 18, 2009, 21:45 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Claudio
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I’ve been reading some tutorials, and I still can’t figure out how to mesh my geometry. What I’m trying to model is flow inside a cylindrical duct with a smaller cylindrical obstacle inside, i.e., flow only occurs through the annular gap that surrounds the obstacle. Since the problem is axisymmetric, I’m only modeling a “slice” of the geometry. The fluid region can be seen in image number 1. I know that due to symmetry, this model could be solved in 2d, but I want to learn how to solve it in 3d. I’m looking to obtain a mesh similar to image 3, but of course, in 3d. I’ve been fooling around with the different mesh sizing options, and can’t get it right. (I want a mesh that is good enough to capture the flow through the gap correctly and that then transitions to a coarser mesh as it moves away from the gap) I think it would be much easier if the annular gap was a separate “entity” that could have its own mesh sizing options, different from the rest of the fluid region. How could that be done? One idea I have is to use the Design Modeler to create a multi-body part and try to get a connected mesh across each body. How do I indicate to the mesher that I want a connected mesh at that interface? Also, then how can I make a fluid-fluid interface, in order for CFX to consider all the fluid regions as a continuous unity? By the way, I’m using Meshing 12.0.01 that comes with the Ansys Workbench. Thanks a lot! |
|
September 19, 2009, 00:28 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 17 |
Why can't you set a Face Spacing on your obstacle cylinder, with an influence radius of 1mm?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] Meshing advice for complex domains | gregorv | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 9 | September 10, 2008 02:51 |
Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder | Nutrex | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 29, 2008 12:03 |
Meshing locks workbench window. | andy2o | CFX | 0 | February 1, 2008 06:01 |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:09 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:08 |