|
[Sponsors] |
August 23, 2009, 21:44 |
Steady state particle tracking?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 17 |
I had used CFX for transient particle tracking problems, which is very time consuming since very small time step may be required. Can CFX be used to perform steady state particle tracking? if so, how to do it?
Fluent has the Discrete phase model (DPM) for the steady state analysis, which is very convenient for particle residence time distribution analysis. Does CFX also have the same capacity? Thanks, John |
|
August 24, 2009, 08:45 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Yes, CFX has steady state particle tracking. Some tutorial examples use it, have a look there to see how to set it up. I do not know exactly what residence time analysis fluent can do but I suspect you will be able to do similar analyses in CFX.
|
|
August 24, 2009, 13:35 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks. Could you please advise which tutorials have such information? I checked the version 10 documentation and could not find any related info.
Regards, John |
|
August 24, 2009, 20:06 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
I think several of the tutorial examples, even back in V10, used particle tracking. You will have to look through them to find them as I have not had V10 for many years.
|
|
August 11, 2013, 17:55 |
steady state vis-a-vis transient particle tracking
|
#5 |
New Member
mira
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello everybody,
I want to understand the differences between these two ways of particle tracking? Are the real particles represented by means of Parcels for steady state tracking, too? what is different for the structure of the particle tracks file for both cases? It would be great, if someone experienced in Particle Transport Modeling in CfX could answer these questions Thank you! |
|
August 11, 2013, 19:34 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Probably the best way of answering this question is to do a quick steady state and transient particle tracking simulation and have a look at the output files.
And yes, for both steady and transient particle tracking the modelled particles represent a large number of real particles. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
plz help,urgent, vof model steady state | Garima Chaudhary | FLUENT | 4 | March 15, 2018 13:22 |
Number density tracking rather than particle tracking | Rebecca | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 23, 2009 13:52 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 02:29 |
Steady state DPM - Convergence and particle tracks | Sandilya Garimella | FLUENT | 2 | March 28, 2008 16:53 |
particle tracking | Gab | CFX | 0 | January 5, 2006 17:12 |