|
[Sponsors] |
Help Required on CFD for Turbine Blade Analysis |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 10, 2009, 11:11 |
Help Required on CFD for Turbine Blade Analysis
|
#1 |
New Member
Kami
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
i m new here .. nd i m nt familiar with ANSYS flotran.. so can any one help me in doing a turbine blade analysis... i have the same divergent solution error each time ... the solution is not converging i already use the MIR stability conditions... i m not sure about the reference conditions will any body explain me how to specify them... the temperature at the inlet is 900 K and pressure is 1.96 bar. i m also using artificial Viscosity concept but the results are not with in range and negative temperature error occured.. kindly some one help me .. thanks in advance for any response...... |
|
July 11, 2009, 09:18 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Hi,
Are you using ANSYS Flotran? That package is very old technology and you really should more to a more modern solver. Things like artificial viscosity are so 1990's. Glenn Horrocks |
|
July 11, 2009, 20:17 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Kami
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 17 |
thanks for ur reply friend... i know its old but i have my project in tht so i have to do it so if anybody can help me in these i will be thankful...
|
|
July 12, 2009, 00:39 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Hi,
I don't think you will find many people who know Flotran here but the general concepts of CFD are applicable to all solvers. I would check things like convergence, mesh size and quality, time step size (if transient), physical accuracy of the boundary conditions and validity of the modelled physics. Start with a coarse grid, tight convergence, double precision numerics and lots of upwinding to have a nice stable solution. Once that is running OK then start moving to more accurate but unstable schemes on finer grids, higher order discretisation. You can also check whether you need double precision numerics and determine how tight convergence is required in your case. Also consider starting at a lower pressure ratio and increasing it. Shoudl make convergence easier. Glenn Horrocks |
|
July 12, 2009, 17:42 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Kami
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks Friend...
so i m going to explain my problem.. wht i have to do is a turbine blade analysis. the pic below will show u the whole domain.. 6 number of turbine blades and a fluid channel. the upper side of the domain is the inlet side and the downward side is the exit side... at inlet the boundary conditions given are: inlet velocity: Vx = 31.5 Vy = -43.5 Vz = 0 Pressure = 1.96e5 Temp = 900 K at exit side the boundary conditions are: Pressure = 1.932e5 at blade walls the velocity components are zero. and at the side walls symmetry boundary condition is used. I will be very thankful to u if u take a look at this. waiting for ur reply friend. thanks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD analysis of turbine blades | jayaero | FLUENT | 1 | June 10, 2009 01:26 |
CFD Analysis of pump | remith | CFX | 7 | October 6, 2008 08:57 |
ASME CFD Symposium | Chris Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 22, 2001 07:41 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 22:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 05:49 |