|
[Sponsors] |
High order scheme vs Specified Blend factor 1 |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 19, 2009, 07:58 |
High order scheme vs Specified Blend factor 1
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17 |
I have read that the High order scheme in Ansys CFX v11 is more robust, but less accurate than using a specified blend factor of 1.
However in my simulations of flow around a 3D wing it seems that I have it the other way round For example my largest max residual with the high order scheme is stuck at around 5e-4 for the momentum in the "lift" direction, while with a specified blend factor of 1 all momentum residuals go below 1e-4 and with a faster convergence rate towards the end of the simulation ( 0.8 vs 0.9) Could it be that the default high order scheme's adjustment of the blend factor be causing problems with convergence ? Other details My mesh is structured hex, double precision is turned on. Minimum Orthogonality Angle 30.9 Maximum Aspect Ratio 219.5 Maximum Mesh Expansion Factor 15.3 |
|
November 10, 2015, 11:36 |
High order scheme vs Specified Blend factor 1
|
#2 |
New Member
|
I quote oj.bulmer
Quote:
"But if you don't have a higher order solution, then becomes , and for any value of B, you get the solution the same as ." Regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High order FVM scheme .... | cfd_newbie | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 6, 2008 07:46 |
High order FVM scheme .... | cfd_newbie | FLUENT | 0 | February 4, 2008 14:43 |
High order difference scheme for KIVA3v2??? | LiQiang | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 9, 2005 14:50 |
Discretisation scheme in CFX-1st or 2nd order? | Pete | CFX | 10 | January 12, 2005 13:48 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |