CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

High order scheme vs Specified Blend factor 1

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 19, 2009, 07:58
Default High order scheme vs Specified Blend factor 1
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 17
realanony87 is on a distinguished road
I have read that the High order scheme in Ansys CFX v11 is more robust, but less accurate than using a specified blend factor of 1.
However in my simulations of flow around a 3D wing it seems that I have it the other way round
For example my largest max residual with the high order scheme is stuck at around 5e-4 for the momentum in the "lift" direction,
while with a specified blend factor of 1 all momentum residuals go below 1e-4 and with a faster convergence rate towards the end of the simulation ( 0.8 vs 0.9)

Could it be that the default high order scheme's adjustment of the blend factor be causing problems with convergence ?

Other details
My mesh is structured hex, double precision is turned on.
Minimum Orthogonality Angle 30.9
Maximum Aspect Ratio 219.5
Maximum Mesh Expansion Factor 15.3
realanony87 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 10, 2015, 11:36
Default High order scheme vs Specified Blend factor 1
  #2
New Member
 
R.Maleci
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17
heron1 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to heron1
I quote oj.bulmer


Quote:
Originally Posted by oj.bulmer View Post
Yes you do need to have a second (or higher order) solution in order to be able to use the blending factor. In very simplistic terms, blending factor B can be defined as:

\phi  =  \phi_{first-order} +  B*(\phi_{higher-order}-\phi_{first-order})

Here \phi is the quantity like velocity, pressure etc.

Now, if you have a look at the equation, if B=0, we have results of first order and if B=1, we have results of higher order. But if you don't have a higher order solution, then \phi_{higher-order} becomes \phi_{first-order}, and for any value of B, you get the solution the same as \phi_{first-order}.

Hence it is necessary to have a second or higher order solution in order to use blending factor.

It is healthy to go gradually from first order to different blending factors (0.4, 0.7) etc depending on your unstability and then switch to second order, if you are having problems with direct second order solutions.

OJ
It could depend by this part:

"But if you don't have a higher order solution, then \phi_{higher-order} becomes \phi_{first-order}, and for any value of B, you get the solution the same as \phi_{first-order}."


Regards
heron1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High order FVM scheme .... cfd_newbie Main CFD Forum 2 February 6, 2008 07:46
High order FVM scheme .... cfd_newbie FLUENT 0 February 4, 2008 14:43
High order difference scheme for KIVA3v2??? LiQiang Main CFD Forum 1 May 9, 2005 14:50
Discretisation scheme in CFX-1st or 2nd order? Pete CFX 10 January 12, 2005 13:48
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 06:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:39.