|
[Sponsors] |
April 8, 2009, 18:28 |
Combining bodies in CFX
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi All,
The short version of my question: I have a problem with CFX-Pre being very very slow in a geometry with lots of sub-bodies within each mesh. I'm looking for advice on how to recombine sub-bodies into one larger mesh body. The longer version: The mesh matches perfectly at the boundaries of the sub-bodies as they were created by a single ANSYS meshing application mesh operation. Decomposition of the geometry into sub-bodies was necessary to get a good mesh using the ANSYS sweep mesher. However, I now need to make 40 copies of this mesh in CFX-Pre to model my domain, and I end up with >1500 mesh sub-bodies in CFX-Pre a result and CFX-Pre becomes very very very slow. Any advice on how to recombine mesh sub-bodies, or to speed up CFX when may sub-bodies are present would be very welcome. Many thanks for your advice, andy2o |
|
April 9, 2009, 08:30 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 17 |
Not exactly an answer to your questions, but instead of so many copies of your mesh, could you make use of symmetry or periodicity boundary conditions?
|
|
April 9, 2009, 08:42 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply. It's a sensible suggestion - and indeed I had hoped to use periodicity to model just one section of the geometry. However, a combination of variable source terms and test results are showing that this just cannot easily be justified. Best regards, andy2o |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
Importing solutions in CFX. | Alphonso | CFX | 1 | August 1, 2008 15:01 |
PhD using CFX | Rui | CFX | 9 | May 28, 2007 06:59 |
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 4 | July 26, 2006 12:59 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |