|
[Sponsors] |
December 17, 2008, 07:40 |
particle tracking
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i have a question on the interpolation of the flow velocity at the particle position. This is what the CFX theory says: "In the calculation of all the forces, many fluid variables, such as density, viscosity and velocity are needed at the position of the particle. These variables are always obtained accurately by calculating the element in which the particle is traveling, calculating the computational position within the element, and using the underlying shape functions of the discretization algorithm to interpolate from the vertices to the particle position" I think this works if the particle size is smaller than the cell size and does not work if it is bigger. Or am I wrong?
|
|
December 17, 2008, 17:59 |
Re: particle tracking
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Yes, for Lagrangian particle tracking it is assumed the particle is small compared to the grid size. If the particle is larger than the mesh size then you should look at the immersed body model coming in CFX V12. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blood Damage Modelling via Particle Tracking in a Centrifugal Heart Pump | scatman | CFX | 7 | January 8, 2018 01:59 |
massless particle tracking problem | Renold | FLUENT | 0 | January 26, 2011 15:23 |
Particle Tracking for ion | Jun | CFX | 2 | August 31, 2010 09:19 |
Number density tracking rather than particle tracking | Rebecca | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 23, 2009 13:52 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 02:29 |