CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Simulation of supersonic flows

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 29, 2008, 05:56
Default Simulation of supersonic flows
  #1
Abduri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi guys,

my simulation is about a flow of about Mach 6 to 7 over a ramp oder other arbitrary geometries. It is a transient simulation. Inlet speed, pressure and temperatures vary as a function of time.

1. I already had problem to run a steady-state calculation of Mach 7. My pressure here is just about 10 Pa. Temperature about 230K. I finally managed that somehow.

2. I took the steady-state, changed it to a transient simulation but it just won't work. It calculates the first timestep with a wierd number at P-Mass and at second timestep it already breaks down showing F at P-Mass. Courant number is above 999 (I know it is not a parameter for transient simulations).

I checked tutorials and tried everything. Changing Advection Schemes, chaning inlet turbulence setting from low (1%) to the other one. I also tried an adaptive timestep setting holding the Courant Number below 0.5 but first my timestep gets very very small and second it fails anyway after few timesteps. My mesh also seems to be alright.

What am I doing wrong? Whats the basic settings for transient supersonic problems? I somehow have the feeling it has to do with the pressure level I use, but my problems environment has a low pressure level starting with 10 Pa going up to pressure at sea level at end of simulation time. What pressures values do I need to set to simulate this? Maybe a high value for relative pressures?

Thank you very much for taking your time and your response! Greetings, Abduri
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 1, 2008, 09:36
Default Re: Simulation of supersonic flows
  #2
MP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Abduri,

I think the CFX do not handle the supersonic flow correctly.

Regards

MOP
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 1, 2008, 09:36
Default Re: Simulation of supersonic flows
  #3
MP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Abduri,

I think the CFX do not handle the supersonic flow correctly.

Regards

MP
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 1, 2008, 09:47
Default Re: Simulation of supersonic flows
  #4
Timon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try tweaking with some solver options designed to deal with instabilities specifically associated with high speed flow. Turn on high speed numerics (switches on Carbuncle fix etc.), and increase the number of continuity loops performed (expert parameter "mass continuity loops = n". Furthermore try to get better initial conditions by increasing the velocity stepwise and restart with the results/
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 1, 2008, 21:50
Default Re: Simulation of supersonic flows
  #5
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Rubbish. CFX can do supersonic flows. They can be tricky to get right - Timon has some good suggestions.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2008, 20:30
Default Re: Simulation of supersonic flows
  #6
Abduri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Guys,

thank you for your answers. It helped. Changed some settings and especially the mesh and it all works now.

Cheers, Abduri
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Numerical simulation of Supersonic Combustion Sarath FLUENT 1 August 25, 2021 10:12
LES of Sprays Combustion in Supersonic Flows liqiangnwpu OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 March 26, 2005 14:20
Kiva simulation of supersonic flows lq Main CFD Forum 0 October 29, 2004 04:55
Parallel simulation of unsteady flows MLJ Main CFD Forum 5 June 14, 2000 02:24
Large Eddy simulation Andreas Hauser Main CFD Forum 1 May 20, 2000 21:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:34.