|
[Sponsors] |
Porous domain vs Subdomain General Momentum Source |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 18, 2008, 16:37 |
Porous domain vs Subdomain General Momentum Source
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear All, I have find an interesting fact. If I set Darcy equation Source = -(Viscosity/Permeability)*Velocity/Porosity as a General Momentum Source, the results I obtained are not logical and very different from porous domain with the same data. Does anyone have a comment on this? Alvio
|
|
November 18, 2008, 16:44 |
Re: Porous domain vs Subdomain General Momentum So
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, the differences in the results were due to the fact that I was using Velocity in standard frame instead of simply the velocity (I have relative motion between the domains)
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[swak4Foam] swak4foam building problem | GGerber | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 54 | April 24, 2015 17:02 |
pisoFoam compiling error with OF 1.7.1 on MAC OSX | Greg Givogue | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 3 | March 4, 2011 18:18 |
Mass source, Momentum source theory. | diffo | FLUENT | 4 | August 21, 2009 11:26 |
Pressure jump and momentum source | Tanya | FLUENT | 1 | June 4, 2009 16:22 |
no enthalpy change across the momentum source | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 2 | December 19, 2005 03:33 |