|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
I have a question about parallel performance. Im using a quadcore processor with only 2gb of memmory running on win xp. I have set up a 2D model and the solver slows down the more cores I use when I run in local parallel mode. For me it is a lot faster to run in serial mode. Is this because the bottle neck is the communication between the different partitions or is there another explanation? Best regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If it is a small grid, the communication overhead may be greater than the parallelization benefit. That said, if you're running with PVM on Windows you may see better performance by using MPICH (or MPICH2 on XP64) instead.
-CycLone |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 08:36 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 19:07 |