|
[Sponsors] |
August 21, 2008, 00:48 |
wall boundary conditions
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi what is meant by rotating wall,how to give in CFX-11
|
|
August 21, 2008, 11:14 |
Re: wall boundary conditions
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the wall would rotate with a sepecified velocity( angular velocity)
|
|
August 21, 2008, 11:25 |
Re: wall boundary conditions
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i given in that some error is showing my boundary conditions: inletressure 7.5bar and tem;167C outlet i given mass flow rate:0.3kg/s fluid:steam
ERROR #002100048 has occurred in subroutine SU_BNEXT. | | Message: | | All vertices for a fluid domain lie on boundaries. This is | | considered to be a fatal error because control volume gradients | | cannot be calculated, leading to serious discretization error. | | | | A common cause for this error is a mesh which is only one | | element thick, without symmetry or 1:1 periodicity on the lateral | | boundaries. If you have this situation, and the domain is | | two-dimensional, please change the lateral boundary conditions | | to symmetry or 1:1 periodicity. Alternatively, for | | three-dimensional simulations, please ensure that your mesh | | has at least two elements across. | | | | Execution is terminating. This error message can be bypassed by | | setting the expert parameter 'boundary vertex check = f', but | | be aware that doing so may lead to sigificant solution error. | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
wall functions and boundary conditions in OF 1.7.1 | cristobal | OpenFOAM | 2 | May 6, 2011 05:10 |
Wall modelling and boundary conditions: why specify value for turbuelnce quantities? | djbungee | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | July 30, 2010 08:32 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 05:05 |
Wall boundary conditions for 3d-cylinder | Martin Bellmann | FLUENT | 1 | July 11, 2008 14:04 |
Boundary conditions? | Tom | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 5, 2002 02:54 |