|
[Sponsors] |
August 12, 2008, 12:31 |
Numerical Diffusion in CFX
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have been experiencing a high degree of numerical diffusion when I run combustion in CFX on a hybrid tet/prism mesh, specifically numerical diffusion with the turbulence transport equations when the flamefront comes within the vacinity of the tet/prism boundary. It seems as if CFX has difficulty resolving the shear layer when a region of flow with a high shear strain gradient comes near the inflated boundary.
I have tried varying turbulence schemes, advections schemes, stress and turbulence diffusion schemes, mesh refinements, etc... but nothing seems to alleviate the problem. Has anyone encountered the this type of behavior before or have any ideas what else I might try to mitigate this false diffusion? Thanks John |
|
August 12, 2008, 16:26 |
Re: Numerical Diffusion in CFX
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How quickly does the mesh expand from the last prism and first tet? The volume ration should be between .5 and 2.
-CycLone |
|
August 12, 2008, 23:36 |
Re: Numerical Diffusion in CFX
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Also what differencing scheme are you using? Need a second order scheme.
Glenn Horrocks |
|
August 13, 2008, 11:16 |
Re: Numerical Diffusion in CFX
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've varied the differencing scheme. I usually run using high resolution. CFX uses the first order upwind scheme by default for turbulence but I changed the CCL to run them high res as well. Post processing the beta values for k and omega so that within the inflated boundary near the wall they are nearly fully second order; however, about half way through the inflated boundary it drops suddenly to first order and then spikes back to second order. I've tried specifying the blend factor but specifying beta > 0.5 causes the solution to become very unstable and crash.
|
|
August 17, 2008, 20:47 |
Re: Numerical Diffusion in CFX
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
You probably need a very good quality grid in this local area to allow you to run at second order differencing. Can you do a local high-quality hex grid? Maybe just do a simple test case to see if this helps. Also don't forget the mesh expansion ratio Cyclone talked about, for a high quality grid keep it below 1.05. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Numerical Diffusion in OpenFOAM | srikanth_b | OpenFOAM | 0 | September 28, 2011 05:50 |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
question about how to define diffusion coefficient in CFX | rystokes | CFX | 0 | December 12, 2009 06:32 |
Numerical Simulation of Gas Metal Arc Welding By CFX | PATELAM | CFX | 0 | November 19, 2009 12:24 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |