|
[Sponsors] |
August 12, 2008, 10:21 |
symmetry boudary condition
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have used symmetry boundary condition for the front and back face of the rectangular cuboid for a 2D case. Do I need to specify the same symmetry boundary conditions for the 3D case of same simulation.??? or leave these faces as walls by default.??? any suggestion?? thanks
|
|
August 13, 2008, 22:25 |
Re: symmetry boudary condition
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Sir MAB,
for 3D, leave as an adiabatic wall, but choose a big width on z direction. when u make a 2d analysis, there is a need to develop a 3D model wide enough to eliminate the wall effects on the calculation, with the objective of comparing with the 2D results widely shown in literature. For 2D (i donīt know how much is your thickness, maybe would it be of one millimeter?) use the symmetry condition, as you have been used. Be of good cheer ! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dynamic Mesh & Symmetry boundary condition | Matt3o | FLUENT | 1 | May 7, 2024 15:32 |
symmetry boundary condition in fluent | v_h_memar | FLUENT | 8 | May 1, 2019 01:08 |
symmetry boundary condition | icemaniac178 | CFX | 3 | March 13, 2011 06:40 |
farfield Vs symmetry boundary condition | Rajat | FLUENT | 1 | October 21, 2005 14:53 |
outlet boudary condition for a flow in the pipe | Atit | CFX | 2 | November 9, 2004 18:43 |