|
[Sponsors] |
July 31, 2008, 05:13 |
CFX best practice for external flows
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Does any know of some best practice guides for external flow (flow over aircraft, 2-D aerofoils and external stores) using CFX? For most of my work I conduct grid independence tests , but I find runs become independent with millions of elements. But was gauging such issues as fluid domian size, I have a good idea what is best for me, but would be interested in what others use. The same goes for inflation layer details - I've not really got a full sense on using yplus and stick with first-layer thinkness instead. And anything else I missed. Thanks. |
|
August 3, 2008, 19:46 |
Re: CFX best practice for external flows
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
That's right - external aircraft aerodynamics will require millions of elements. If you are adding external stores then more like tens or hundreds of millions. That's CFD for you, if you want accurate results for this type of modelling you must get a computer capable of running simulations of this magnitude. Glenn Horrocks |
|
August 3, 2008, 21:17 |
Re: CFX best practice for external flows
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Use Hexa mesh, then you will have less computational effort and less time of cpu.
|
|
August 4, 2008, 03:32 |
Re: CFX best practice for external flows
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Glenn, I'm running with very large element amounts. Odd how in many academic papers runs are made with less than 1 million, however they always omit the details.
With all the options in CFX, of which I don't use many as I don't have the necessary numbers, is there a guide as to what are best for external flow? |
|
August 4, 2008, 22:58 |
Re: CFX best practice for external flows
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
External aerodynamics with less than 1M elements is either inviscid or viscous and hopelessly inaccurate. As to what options to choose - that depends on what you want to do. They would not pay my salary if there was a simple answer to that question. Glenn Horrocks |
|
May 3, 2009, 23:44 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Shawn Givler
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17 |
siw
For bluff bodies and streamlined vehicle aerodynamics my rules of thumb are 2 vehicle widths to each side, 6-10 vehicle lengths downstream, and 2-4 vehicle lengths upstream. Shawn |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 16:45 |
Import Fan 3D Model - Workbench or CFX? | Stewart Long | CFX | 2 | October 28, 2008 05:05 |
MFX: weired force transfer from cfx to ansys | zyf | CFX | 3 | October 7, 2006 04:08 |
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 4 | July 26, 2006 12:59 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |