|
[Sponsors] |
October 14, 2024, 11:00 |
Arithmetic average over last iterations
|
#1 |
New Member
Amin
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello everyone,
I am currently calculating design parameters for an axial multi-stage compressor and need to determine the arithmetic average of several variables to design it properly. One approach is to define monitor points, extract the data, and proceed with the analysis. However, I am dealing with a large number of parameters, and monitoring, for example, 15 variables at each interface is not efficient. Does anyone have suggestions on how to calculate the arithmetic average without relying on monitoring points? In CFX-Post, I can easily calculate the average using "ave," but it differs from the one in SM due to differences in calculation methods. Thanks in advance for your help! |
|
October 14, 2024, 11:37 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
You can create the monitor points, and activate the monitor statistics for each point. You can multi-select which statistics to compute for each monitor point
Which release version are you using? Perhaps you have not explained the subtle details of your calculations? What exactly are you trying to simplify?
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
October 14, 2024, 11:53 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Amin
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,
I am using R23 and I would like to calculate various design parameters such as flow coefficient, degree of reaction, Mach number, and so on. I require these parameters for every passage, which means, for instance, 30 parameters (temperature, pressure, enthalpy, velocity components, etc.) at every interface. Therefore, for multistage, it is not an efficient method to define a monitoring point for each variable at each intersection. In the post-processing , it is very easy to obtain the mass flow average for these parameters. However, I am interested in obtaining the arithmetic average of these parameters over, for example, the last 50 iterations. Thank you for your assistance. |
|
October 14, 2024, 12:16 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
Quote:
1- Either you type the expression once in the preprocessor, and monitor it with live data, or 2- You wait for the simulation to finish, type the exact same expression, manage to have the 50 values you need, and attempt to do it in the post-processor. If your concern is the setting up of similar expressions multiple times, have you looked at "Ansys CFX power syntax via Perl". You can auto-generate the expressions, and import the model.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Maximum number of iterations exceeded chtmultiregionsimpleFoam | Moncef | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | July 13, 2020 15:26 |
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam: maximum number of iterations excedeed. | Nkl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 19 | October 10, 2019 03:42 |
Cannot run the code properly: very large time step continuity error | crst15 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | December 14, 2014 19:17 |
Compressor Simulation using rhoPimpleDyMFoam | Jetfire | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 107 | December 9, 2014 14:38 |
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 04:34 |