CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Model of pump nonoptimal regimes get bad results

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 5, 2008, 07:34
Default Model of pump nonoptimal regimes get bad results
  #1
Georg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all! I try to model a stage of a water pump. I use 'stage' and 'frozen rotor' interface. Results for optimal regime are quite good (well coincidence with experiment). But when I solve the problem for small (non optima)l flow rates (left part of head vs. flow rate curve) results can very differ from experiment (100% or more). What is the reason? What can you recommend to improve the results? Thank you for your responses!
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2008, 08:32
Default Re: Model of pump nonoptimal regimes get bad resul
  #2
Johnny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your pump is probably in the stall regime. This means the flow becomes very unsteady, and you may need to run your case transient (with a transient rotor stator interface) and you may need a finer mesh.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2008, 05:25
Default Re: Model of pump nonoptimal regimes get bad resul
  #3
wayne
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
in the off design condition,the flow is more complex then the optimal regime,stall(as mention in Georg), separation, secondary flow,rotor-stator or rotor-volute interaction even the distribution of the flow rate in the passage are all difficult to calculate. i think finer mesh will give a different result of integral value such as head.but may not be more precise to the experiment result ,you could try a grid sensitve test,to make sure it is problem of the quantity of the grid.and take care of the near wall grid,make sure that is work well with solver.but the great number of the grid element may cause the problem of convergency.try different turbulence model.i think for the first one is standard k-epsilon model for it is easy to get convergent, then is the SST,which is a pretty good engineering model for foresee the separation flow.but all of the eddy viscosity model in CFX can not handle the anisotropy turbulence in the rotating frame of refernce for the Coriolis forces,so even if you can get well performent prediction in design point,you can not get the secondary flow in the passage, velocity distribution and turbulence intensity may quiet different from experiment result.these need to be interpretated with theory of turbulence. try transient calculation or even high level model (RSM,LES..)with the RANS result.the rotating effect is considerated in any of the available Reynolds stress transport model in ANSYS CFX.i do not think LES is suiable for the engineer application as i have tried some,for it waste of time and computation source .at the end of LES case ,you may get more than 100G data file to post,well, it is hard to post also.、
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2008, 01:53
Default Re: Model of pump nonoptimal regimes get bad resul
  #4
Georg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks guys!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad results when compared with Wind Tunnel Luiz CFX 7 October 27, 2006 10:35
Why k-epislon model perform a bad result at corner Lwrence CFX 13 April 8, 2006 08:46
standard k-eps model results? cfd Main CFD Forum 1 March 29, 2005 19:19
Model pump? Neo FLUENT 0 September 19, 2003 07:12
turbulence model for water pump Marcio Main CFD Forum 4 September 3, 2003 10:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:49.