|
[Sponsors] |
April 29, 2008, 05:29 |
Interfaces 1:1 vs numerical error.
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello; Im asking me how can i estimate the error assumed when i use non conformal interfaces versus the 1:1 interfaces. In which cases i shoul avoid non-conformal mesh?
Thanks. |
|
April 29, 2008, 19:48 |
Re: Interfaces 1:1 vs numerical error.
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
What do you mean by "error"? If you mean error in solution outputs then that is obviously highly problem dependant. The GGI interface is pretty good and there are only a few places where you should avoid them. You would try to avoid them aligning with free surface interfaces or other steep gradients. You should also avoid putting them in regions where you are trying to get high precision, such as separations or plumes. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM] Native ParaView Reader Bugs | tj22 | ParaView | 270 | January 4, 2016 12:39 |
Compile problem | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 12, 2012 10:31 |
OpenFOAM install on Ubuntu Natty 11.04 | bkubicek | OpenFOAM | 13 | May 26, 2011 06:48 |
How to install CGNS under windows xp? | lzgwhy | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 11, 2011 19:44 |
Accessing phi from a fvPatchField at same patch | johndeas | OpenFOAM | 1 | September 13, 2010 21:23 |