|
[Sponsors] |
July 3, 2024, 16:34 |
|
#21 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
Certainly there are more sophisticated methods to calculate the mixing time in Post. But if you can't measure this in practice, it has less value. Also, these all remain derived quantities. In principle they should all lead to more or less the same answer. Therefore I would remain comparing the mixing time from the monitoring point as monitored in the experiment. That is what you have in practice.
However, it is not said that this point is the most valuable, characteristic, or critical. Maybe you can find a location in your CFD that is more critical in your chemical/biological process? E.g. look for a region with still water conditions. Then I would advise to move the sensor to that location. That is maximizing the power of CFD. You open the black box. |
|
Tags |
bioreactor, cfx, mixing time, stirred tank, validation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bash script for pseudo-parallel usage of reconstructPar | kwardle | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 42 | May 8, 2024 00:17 |
Postprocess: sampleDict works but creates no output folder | shock77 | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 14 | November 15, 2021 09:27 |
laplacianFoam with source term | Herwig | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | November 19, 2019 14:47 |
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam | chrizzl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 28, 2017 06:49 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |