|
[Sponsors] |
April 11, 2008, 20:13 |
high cambered airfoil SST CFX
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have been trying to validate a profile of high cambered in Re=300000. I have been using the soft CFX, with hexa mesh(y+ <3), the model SST with Gamma Theta Model plus Transition Model Revision = 0. I have had good results for Cl but i am still having some difficulties with the Cd. how could i improve this result? Ps.: I'm a student from BRAZIL. |
|
April 11, 2008, 22:28 |
Re: high cambered airfoil SST CFX
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Vc está comparando com dados experimetais? e suas condições de contorno?
|
|
April 12, 2008, 01:50 |
Re: high cambered airfoil SST CFX
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sim! estou comparando com os dados da UIUC do perfil Selig1223, e com os dados fornecidos pelo programa xfoil. As condições de contorno são as seguintes: INLET - Cartesian Velocity Components TURBULENCE:
Eddy Length Scale = 0.305 [m](corda do aerofoil) Fractional Intensity = 0.009 Option = Intensity and Length Scale OUTLET: Option = Average Static Pressure Relative Pressure = 0 [Pa] END PRESSURE AVERAGING: Option = Average Over Whole Outlet AEROFOIL: WALL - no slip e SYMMETRY para as laterais. Tenho dúvidas com relação a turbulência no Inlet, e o Length Scale, pelo PDF do UIUC a turbulencia usado no túnel de vento seria de 0,1%, mas para esse valor não consegui obter bons resultados. |
|
April 12, 2008, 07:54 |
Re: high cambered airfoil SST CFX
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Try these settings:
BOUNDARY: Inlet Boundary Type = INLET Location = Inlet BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: FLOW REGIME: Option = Subsonic END MASS AND MOMENTUM: Option = Cartesian Velocity Components U = XX.X [m s^-1] V = YY.Y [m s^-1] W = 0 [m s^-1] END TURBULENCE: Option = Medium Intensity and Eddy Viscosity Ratio END END END BOUNDARY: Outlet Boundary Type = OUTLET Location = Outlet BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: FLOW REGIME: Option = Subsonic END MASS AND MOMENTUM: Option = Average Static Pressure Relative Pressure = 0 [Pa] END PRESSURE AVERAGING: Option = Average Over Whole Outlet END END END BOUNDARY: Symmetry1 Boundary Type = SYMMETRY Location = Symmetry1 END BOUNDARY: Symmetry2 Boundary Type = SYMMETRY Location = Symmetry2 END DOMAIN MODELS: BUOYANCY MODEL: Option = Non Buoyant END DOMAIN MOTION: Option = Stationary END MESH DEFORMATION: Option = None END REFERENCE PRESSURE: Reference Pressure = 1 [atm] END END FLUID MODELS: COMBUSTION MODEL: Option = None END HEAT TRANSFER MODEL: Fluid Temperature = 7.7 [C] Option = Isothermal END THERMAL RADIATION MODEL: Option = None END TURBULENCE MODEL: Option = SST TRANSITIONAL TURBULENCE: Option = Gamma Theta Model TRANSITION ONSET CORRELATION: Option = Langtry Menter END END END TURBULENT WALL FUNCTIONS: Option = Automatic END END END DOMAIN INTERFACE: Domain Interface 1 Boundary List1 = Domain Interface 1 Side 1 Boundary List2 = Domain Interface 1 Side 2 Interface Type = Fluid Fluid INTERFACE MODELS: Option = Translational Periodicity END MESH CONNECTION: Option = Automatic END END INITIALISATION: Option = Automatic INITIAL CONDITIONS: Velocity Type = Cartesian CARTESIAN VELOCITY COMPONENTS: Option = Automatic END K: Option = Automatic END OMEGA: Option = Automatic END STATIC PRESSURE: Option = Automatic END END END OUTPUT CONTROL: RESULTS: File Compression Level = Default Option = Standard END END SOLVER CONTROL: ADVECTION SCHEME: Option = High Resolution END CONVERGENCE CONTROL: Length Scale Option = Conservative Maximum Number of Iterations = 2000 Timescale Control = Auto Timescale Timescale Factor = 1.0 END CONVERGENCE CRITERIA: Residual Target = 0.000001 Residual Type = RMS END DYNAMIC MODEL CONTROL: Global Dynamic Model Control = On END END END COMMAND FILE: Version = 11.0 Results Version = 11.0 END EXECUTION CONTROL: INTERPOLATOR STEP CONTROL: Runtime Priority = Standard EXECUTABLE SELECTION: Double Precision = Off END MEMORY CONTROL: Memory Allocation Factor = 1.0 END END |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) | gravis | ANSYS | 3 | March 24, 2011 03:43 |
Help regarding basic airfoil meshing in CFX | amoolraina | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | May 22, 2010 19:51 |
Modeling Backflow for a 3D Airfoil (Wing of Finite Span) | Josh | CFX | 9 | August 18, 2009 12:31 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |